Address provided
16
January 2013
John
Whittingdale MP
House
of Commons
London
SW1A
0AA
Dear
Mr Whittingdale,
Re:
Jeremy
Bamber
I
refer to your letter dated 14 January 2013. Whilst it is a fact that
any conviction may only be overturned by the Court of Appeal it does
not exclude any MP from bringing the concern before Parliament even
to the extent of requesting intervention. You state that 'neither
I nor Parliament has any influence over the matter'
yet as I wrote in my previous letter to yourself, Andrew Hunter felt
able to address Parliament regarding the injustice in Jeremy Bamber's
case. You have also previously spoken about Jeremy Bamber in
Parliament, in 2001, by asking a question in the House of Commons
regarding whether Jeremy’s website should be allowed to exist.
Both the above may be viewed as attempting to influence Parliament.
Recently Parliamentary influence resulted in the money-guzzling
Leveson Inquiry, held, in the main, as a result of
media-attention-seeking celebs complaining when the same back-fired.
Through
his access to files previously intended for PII and inadvertently
sent to him, Jeremy Bamber can prove beyond doubt that he is
innocent. There are hundreds of examples but a few here; no
forensics implicating Jeremy in any part of the crime were found on
the cycle he was supposed to have used as a getaway vehicle –
photographs of the window from which he was supposed to have exited
White House Farm show it was locked from the inside and photographs
taken three weeks after the murders show flakes of red paint on the
kitchen floor and scratches to the mantle which were not present in
the original scene-of-crime photographs taken on the day of the
murders. How did that happen? The silencer (sound moderator) was
pivotal in convicting Jeremy, with the trial judge telling the jury
they could convict him 'on
the evidence of the silencer alone'
but recently discovered photographs of the marks on Nevill Bamber's
body show that they match more precisely the shape and dimensions of
the gun muzzle and not the shape and dimensions of the silencer, yet
the CCRC continue to deny the significance of these along with many
other examples of tampering with evidence and refuse to refer back to
the Court of Appeal. One can only question why?
My
motivation is not only that I believe Jeremy is innocent, but that
this injustice could happen to me or one of mine or even one of
yours. I once would have placed my faith in the integrity of our
Criminal Justice System but over the years many cases of police
corruption and cover-up have been exposed including Eddie Gilfoyle,
Hillsborough, and more recently the Chief Whip Andrew Mitchell
altercation.
Jeremy
Bamber's conviction was brought about by a deliberate and successful
attempt to pervert the course of justice at his trial and continues
via, in my opinion, the collusion of some who have a vested interest
in keeping the truth from being exposed.
Jeremy
has over thirty lever-arch files in his cell, containing documents
destined for PII. He has scrutinised thousands of them and has found
hundreds of pieces of evidence showing how Essex Police and others
perverted the course of justice. I have copies. Why would he spend
twenty seven years trying to prove his innocence if it were not so?
It cannot be an easy task. Jeremy has passed a lie detector test
which was refused him until 2007 and had over twenty five tests for
psychopathy, all negative. He can do no more – it is time for the
guilty to be brought to justice and for justice to be seen to be
done.
Jeremy's
Campaign Team are not weirdos or crackpots or conspiracy junkies;
they are intelligent, caring, informed and enlightened people and
there are many more like them. Public support for Jeremy grows daily
and I take comfort in the fact that when our politicians refuse to
address corruption and injustice it is often public opinion which
enforces change. Jeremy hangs on to his father's words, 'Don't worry
Jeremy, the truth always comes out in the wash'.
I
will keep you informed, at least I can say I tried and if-and-when
the truth does come out, you can never say, you did not know.
Yours
sincerely,
cc. Nick
Clegg Deputy Prime Minister
No comments:
Post a Comment