Justice4Jeremy Pathologist's Views

Dr Vanezis, the pathologist who examined the bodies had not detailed a time of death for any of the deceased in his report. He provided the police with statements written long after the post mortem, the first during September and others during November 1985 and May 1986 when he used his notes and scene photographs to assist him.                                                                            Typed  The Dickinson review then requested that he write an additional report post trial and the extracts below are taken from this report which appears to be much more candid and in favour of the Defence than his pre-trial statements. Regarding his initial examinations he stated:   “Sheila had suffered two gunshot wounds. I was a little concerned with this but in my experience, bearing in mind the low velocity of the weapon, whilst unusual, suicide with two shots does occur. I have experienced four or five in the past. In order to consider this a possibility, however, I must have been impressed by the information given to me as to position of the weapon, length of barrel and the ability of Sheila to reach the trigger. I had been told it was a semi-automatic weapon.  The result of my P.M. examination of Sheila was 'death due to gunshot wounds'. My examination did not reveal anything to contradict the suicide theory and I must say, although I could not from my examination, confirm murder or suicide”  The post mortem’s continued the following day and Dr Peter Vanezis further states:   “Having discussed the number of shots involved (24) I was told the magazine could hold at least eight cartridges. Sheila was a farmer's daughter and would have been used to firearms. I drew no serious consequence from the number of shots fired.”    When DS Stan Jones later asked him some time later what he thought about it being a murder/suicide he wrote:   “Whilst respecting his views there was nothing impressive about what he said and certainly I cannot recall anything of evidential substance to the effect that Sheila could not have done it.”   Dr Vanezis continues:   “I then discussed the two possibilities : If it wasn't Sheila it had to be Jeremy. We went over the information and I expressed the views that Jeremy would have to be a nutter to have done what had occurred, in that he must have had such a warped state of mind to engineer it in the manner in which it was presented. This was almost too incredible to believe. Additionally, in order to stage manage Sheila she would probably need to be under the influence of drugs. I said that I would ascertain the results of the drug analysis with regard to that point before completing my report.”   The drug analysis came back negative, apart from the tests showing a reduced dose of Haloperidol a treatment for Schizophrenia, and a trace of Cannabis taken some four days earlier, Sheila had not been sedated. In support of Dr Vanezis views, Jeremy Bamber had no history violence, has never had any mental illness, and does not have any psychopathic traits in 27 different assessments. Sheila Caffell on the other hand, was delusional, volatile, suicidal and “could use physical aggression directed to property, herself or others” As detailed by her Psychologist, her boyfriend and other witnesses who gave police statements.  It is unclear why the views expressed by the pathologist shifted in this report which seems to suggest that he was influenced by the information provided by police. He also described one of the bullet's in Sheila Caffell's body as "Fragmented" but Malcolm Fletcher the Ballistics expert for the prosecution describes it as whole which is how it was presented at trial. Read more about Sheila's X-Ray's and the fragmented bullet here.  Professor Peter Vanezis is now a leading Home Office Pathologist.  Links: http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/dickinson-enquiry http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/pathologist-s-views

Julie Mugford 'Hell Hath No Fury....'

In 1985, when Jeremy Bamber was twenty four years of age, Julie Mugford was one of his girlfriends.  After Jeremy's family were murdered he ended his relationship with Julie Mugford.  

After Jeremy Bamber had ended their relationship, Julie Mugford went to Essex Police and informed them that Jeremy had admitted to her that he wanted his parents dead and had hired a 'hit-man' to kill them and that Jeremy had said to her, 'Tonight is the night'.  Julie Mugford also admitted to the police that she was so upset with Jeremy that she had tried to smother him in his sleep. 

Julie Mugford, however, was being charged by Essex Police with fraud and burglary.  Subsequently she was given immunity from these charges in return for her statement.

Link below to document evidencing this.

"Enclosures came into existence as a result of Mr Bamber... on Twitpic

Please join Jeremy's new campaign 'DON'T LET IT BE YOU!'

Justice4Jeremy. New evidence of innocence

For twenty six years Jeremy Bamber has been fighting for justice, his freedom and to clear his name, having been falsely accused and imprisoned for the murder of his family.  Jeremy has always maintained his innocence.  New evidence shown here, which was known by the prosecution but denied to Jeremy in his trial and Appeals, supports his claims.

Police responsible for Sheila's death (Part 3)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EDp_tqUysI&feature=player_embedded#!

Don't Let It Be YOU! Jeremy Bamber, Susan May, Eddie Gilfoyle, wrongly convicted

The CCRC advised Jeremy's lawyer that they intend to close their case on him if there are no submissions made tomorrow, 9 December 2011. The advice comes after the defence requested a three month extension. Lawyers representing Jeremy have asked if some of the submissions could be rushed through and submitted on Monday the 12th of December but it remains to be seen if these would be taken into consideration.

The Defence made requests to the CCRC back in July with letters from forensic scientists requesting to see original scene and event logs which needed to be obtained from Essex Police using Section 17 of the Criminal Appeals act. All requests were ignored. The Defence has been unable to carry out forensic work as a result.

The Defence also paid a sum of £2,295 for electronic RAW files to be made of the crime scene negatives. The CCRC are currently holding these raw image files on disc and have refused to disclose them to the defence's new legal team who have signed a non disclosure agreement as per request.

The CCRC was not willing to take into consideration their own delays which have resulted in the defence being unable to complete forensic work. They also would not consider that Jeremy Bamber has had a change of legal representation and that the case files are considerably comprehensive.

Jeremy Bamber has raised new complaints with the IPCC and Essex Police after crime scene photographs showed police disrespect fooling around within just feet of where there body of Neville Bamber lay in the kitchen. Further complaints were raised last month after it was discovered that allegations of theft from the Bamber estate by a key prosecution witness in 1986 were not addressed for over 13 months, an investigation was looked into but never carried out as police felt it best to delay until after the first appeal of Jeremy Bamber.

Jeremy Bamber said this evening "I will keep fighting. I am and innocent man and I will never stop until I am a free man with my name fully cleared."

Jeremy Bamber can re-apply to the CCRC but this would put his case to the 'bottom of the pile' which is of no great significance considering the CCRC have held his case since 2004 and achieved nothing except to continually obstruct Jeremy in his fight for freedom. Campaigners for Jeremy Bamber are more determined than ever and are encouraging supporters to contact the CCRC with complaints as well as take part in the latest writing campaign "Don't Let It Be YOU!"

Admin Team.

Merry Christmas Eddie and Keela

Let's not forget these two amazing animals.  They and many other dogs like them have senses far beyond our human capacity.  They only report truth as they find it; have no axe to grind and no scores to settle.  We can only look and learn.