Jeremy Bamber: Justice perverted by police

From the date of the murders in 1985 at White House Farm, Pages Lane, Tollesbury, Essex, it appears, upon reading the documents which have since come to light, that some Essex Police officers conspired to pervert the course of justice by altering statements, forensics and call logs, thus convincing all but two of the jury at Jeremy Bamber's trial, that he was guilty. And now after thirty years and despite the disclosure of thousands more documents evidencing this, they have not the humility or the humanity to own up and admit, 'it's a fair cop', thereby enabling Jeremy to spend the rest of his life as the free man he has the right to be.

 For more documents showing how Jeremy's, then girlfriend, Julie Mugford (now Smerchanski and living in Winnipeg, Canada) colluded with the police and lied in her statements as well as the part Jeremy's relatives, Ann Eaton and Robert Boutflour played in fostering Jeremy's guilt, please visit the site: http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/

As a prisoner Jeremy has no civil rights so has had to suffer the lies fostered by some media, and outrageous, malicious and false TV programmes, along with books written by those who just want to make a buck out of an innocent man who cannot fight back. But we have civil rights and as such can fight to bring to light what must be the gravest miscarriage of justice ever in the UK.

Hearing from his supporters really encourages Jeremy and gives him hope. Write to:
Jeremy N Bamber, A5352AC, HM Full Sutton, York, Y041 1PS or email him using www.emailaprisoner.com with NOMS number A5352AC

Jermy Bamber: Appeal rejection

Although I despise the negative terminology used in regard to Jeremy in much of the press, I do believe that public opinion is valuable and whilst Jeremy remains in the media there is hope that people will read the real evidence which shows beyond all doubt that Jeremy could not have committed the murders for which he has been unjustly imprisoned for twenty seven years.

In order to change public opinion, first you have to gain their attention.

 Poppy Ann Miller

 

Tolleshunt D'Arcy: Bamber vows to fight on after latest appeal rejection

Attrib: 11:00am Saturday 8th December 2012 in Countywide news Essex County Standard Edited:

Tolleshunt D'Arcy: Bamber vows to fight on after latest appeal rejection 

              

Jeremy Bamber has vowed to fight on after losing a High Court bid to have his case reviewed.
Bamber, 51, was jailed for life in 1986 for the murders of his parents June and Nevill, his adopted sister Sheila Caffell, 27, and her twin sons Nicholas and Daniel at the family farm in Tolleshunt D’Arcy.

Bamber has always protested his innocence claiming it was Sheila, who was a schizophrenic, who killed the family before turning the gun on herself.

Bamber is calling for a third appeal against his conviction.

However, the Criminal Cases Review Commission refused to refer his application.

Bamber’s legal team challenged the decision and applied for permission to seek a judicial review.

However, last Thursday, at the High Court, his application was refused by Sir John Thomas, president of the Queen's Bench Division, and Mr Justice Globe.

SEE THE STANDARD FOR THE FULL STORY
http://www.essexcountystandard.co.uk/search/?page=1&searchpattern=Jeremy+Bamber
 

Jeremy Bamber: Dickinson Inquiry:Perversion of justice

 Atttrib: http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/dickinson-enquiry

In November 1986 after the trial of Jeremy Bamber the trial Judge Mr Justice Drake ordered an enquiry into the conduct of Esssex Police. The investigation was directed by the Chief Constable, Mr Robert Bunyard. The review was conducted by Detective Chief Superintendent Dickinson of Essex Police assisted by DI Storey. This investigation consisted of interviews with Police officers and witnesses but no statements were taken although statements and other material submissions from pre-trial were used during the enquiry. It was also noted that the papers available did not include any written records of the original senior investigating officer DCI Thomas Jones who died in a tragic accident at his home on 11th May 1986. <!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]--> The Dickinson report was an account which relied heavily on the accounts of Jeremy Bamber’s relatives and in particular his uncle Robert Boutflour. The final report does not accurately reflect events which were uncovered by Dickinson and Storey. It is only post 2002 appeal that extensive handwritten accounts of interviews have been disclosed to the defence. Missing from the Defence copies were the interviews of Julie Mugford and her mother Mary Mugford. In addition to this many of the senior police officer’s interviews are also missing.  Overall the review inaccurately drew on accounts which contradict the original statements of witnesses and even contradicted court testimony. It also presented Jeremy Bamber in a biased way using the accounts of Julie Mugford and Robert Boutflour to provide a complete character assassination of Jeremy presented as a money hungry sexual predator who was also engaged in “unsavoury homosexual activities”. At the end of the report DCI Dickinson concluded that the most senior investigating officer had not visited the scene until after the bodies had been disturbed. He also found that owing to a "shortage of resources," senior officers DCI Jones, DI Cook and DI Montgomery had failed to request that a pathologist and ballistics expert attend the scene with the bodies in situ. Recommendations were made pertaining to these points and also included issues of training and force communication with other police sources. DCI Dickinson would have us believe that Jeremy Bamber was so sophisticated that he managed to fool a large number of senior and junior police officers at the scene and later a pathologist and ballistics expert. We put it that it is highly unlikely and improbable that experienced police officers attending such a tragic scene would have ignored key evidence if they had not been 100% convinced that Sheila Caffell had killed the family. In 2002 the appeal court judges placed little significance on any of the Dickinson report referred to by the Defence including the issue of inheritance an area which has developed further in light of evidence disclosed since the 2002 appeal which brings into question the credibility of key prosecution witnesses in particular that of Robert Boutflour.