PoppyMeze

Showing posts with label COLP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label COLP. Show all posts

Tuesday, 22 July 2014

About Jeremy Bamber

Many people may have heard of Jeremy Bamber; others support him and are familiar with his case and the outrageous miscarriage of justice.  Copied from Jeremy's website, I found the following helpful in providing some insight into Jeremy's background, friends and family.

Copyright ©Jeremy Bamber Campaign http://jeremybamber.org/jeremy-bamber/
The Author’s view                                                                                                        December 2011

This is not a direct account from Jeremy Bamber. It is my view on Jeremy and his circumstances written as author. I have been kindly granted access to all available evidence regarding Jeremy’s case including 130 lever arch files of papers, which has enabled me to build a picture of Jeremy during this period. I have also sourced various accounts from people who know Jeremy. It is from these documents that I have drawn my conclusions that Jeremy Bamber was an innocent man, wrongly convicted in the prime of his life. The character of Jeremy as I see it is one which contrasts with popular myth brought about by the media.

Background
Jeremy’s natural mother was 16 and lived in Scotland, and his father a young army recruit. His natural father was married at the time he was conceived and later divorced his wife to marry Jeremy’s natural mother. His father rose to be an Army General and I believe they are still married to this day, they also had more children together, Jeremy Bamber’s full brother and sister are called Justin Marsham and Sophie Marsham.

Jeremy was adopted through the church by June and Nevill Bamber who provided a kind and loving family, and Jeremy feels very fortunate to have grown up in this environment. He enjoyed life on the farm, had his own dog and learned the skill of farming from an early age. He loved Sheila despite them going their separate ways during their teenage years. Jeremy enjoys cultivating plants and he has expressed a desire to return to farming, though I think small scale farming would be on his agenda these days.

As a young man he went to the renowned Gresham College. Jeremy is intelligent, and is particularly interested in engineering, architecture, sculpture and physics. He has always enjoyed keeping fit and still goes to the gym every day he can, he is also interested in yoga and meditation. Jeremy didn’t pursue a degree after college but while in prison he has gained many educational qualifications and spends long hours working on his case as well attending the Brallie translation workshop.

Jeremy did not dress up as Adam Ant on the farm, contrary to popular belief, but was always smart and well presented when he wasn’t farming. He did go into London to meet up with friends and he saw Sheila every couple of weeks; he was friends with Colin Caffell and they got on well. Jeremy was definitely a ‘farmer’s boy’ who very much enjoyed that life style and wanted it to continue that way.

From 79-80 Jeremy spent time in Australia travelling. For 5 months he worked on a sugar plantation working with a family in Queensland; he really enjoyed employment for them on the farm and still speaks about their ingenious inventions of various types of machinery to harvest crops. At the end of that year he went to New Zealand and back to Australia a couple of times but for no great length of time. It has been suggested that Jeremy hated farming, if this was so then why did he work on a farm in Australia and not as a barman for example?
Last Day of Freedom
Coping with the tragedies at White House Farm

Everyone copes with trauma in different ways. Jeremy had been kept away from the house when the fire arms team were called in. He had been asked to stay in a police car on Pages Lane with officers, who testified that he was distressed, he kept looking as though he was going to break down and they distracted him with talk of other things. PC Lay stated in his 1st of October statement:
“There were two or three occasions during the conversation that Jeremy appeared to be getting upset. On one of these occasions he said, “Oh God, I hope she hasn’t done anything stupid.” I didn’t ask him to elaborate on that remark as the man was getting distressed and so I steered the conversation to another subject.”
Lay goes on to say:
“The Witham Duty Sergeant came over to the car. He went to the nearside and opened the passenger door and said – I’m very sorry there’s no hope for any of them.” Or words to that effect. At that Jeremy burst into tears and the sergeant tried to console him.”

Other officers detail in their statements that Jeremy was crying and was visibly upset and distressed. When the doctor arrived he gave him a sip of whiskey from a hip flask. This made Jeremy sick. When they took Jeremy to his home, police insisted he eat something to stop him from retching. He had little food in the house and went to the fridge, the only thing he could find was bacon which he put into the microwave and then into two pieces of bread, he ate this with the encouragement of the police officers and so is the kernel of the myth of the jolly Jeremy Bamber sitting at this kitchen table eating a hearty cooked breakfast with police officers.

Many of Jeremy’s responses have been used against him, for example, the talk of buying a Porsche was used as evidence to demonstrate that he was already planning to spend his inheritance on a new Sports car, but the truth was that Jeremy was referring to a buying a cheap kit Porsche. The case is littered with myths and circumstantial evidence. The facts are that there was no evidence against Jeremy Bamber; nothing connecting him to the scene. In court the moderator was the only thing suggesting that Sheila had not shot herself. She could not have fired one shot leaving her blood in the moderator and then taken the moderator downstairs and put it in the gun cupboard and gone back upstairs again where she was found. Even though this still did not connect Jeremy to the killings, the judge stated at court that because Jeremy said that his father had made the call to him – this would mean that it had to be either Jeremy or Sheila and not a third party. It does beg the question as to why there has been so much emphasis placed on the precarious evidence of Mugford and her hit man story which was demonstrably disproved. So, with absolutely no evidence – why is he in prison?

Jeremy Bamber let Julie Mugford and his friends and relatives take over the running of almost every part of the aftermath of the tragedy.[1] Unable to cope with entering White House Farm without experiencing trauma and severe anxiety Jeremy continued to smoke cannabis heavily, whilst drinking alcohol and taking diazepam as prescribed by his doctor. [2]

The question must have turned over in his mind a million times: If I hadn’t left the gun out on the settle would this still have happened?Had he forgotten to take the magazine out or not? No, he was sure he had taken the magazine out. Had Sheila noticed that he had left the gun like this? He had blamed himself for his own mistakes, but then the farm was full of guns, a collection of 7 weapons including rifles and shotguns were there and he knew that Sheila could have picked up any one of those at any time.

The family solicitor was later interviewed by police and confirmed that he had advised Jeremy to find out the order of deaths[3] something which was later to be used against him by his relatives and the police. Later when the City of London Police investigated, Mr Wilson told them that Jeremy was very emotional on his visits to him and that he had advised Jeremy that he should be appointed sole director of the businesses.[4]

A few days after the tragedy Jeremy had to face going into the farm, Ann Eaton took Jeremy around the house after she had been in to clean it and remove valuable items she wanted for herself and her family. She stated that he did not want to go into each room and she described Jeremy as “frightened, hesitant and petrified,” a normal reaction for someone having to face where the bodies of their family had been found. [5]

The family accountant had confirmed that Nevill’s bank account was overdrawn by almost £100,000; [6] all of the estate was tied up in assets. Nevill had borrowed this money to convert his estate in Guildford into five houses. Jeremy had the responsibility of running the farm at harvest time, coping with the funerals of his family, the shock, his grief and the prospect of having little money for funerals as well as paying staff wages. He was an inexperienced farmer at just 24 years old, and Basil Cock had advised that Jeremy appoint Peter Eaton as farm manager to help. Jeremy was also advised that death duties would be high and he would have to find ways of cutting down costs. At the time inheritance duties were 40% of all monies inherited over £200,000. The financial difficulty Jeremy faced was because he was to inherit both his parent’s estates at once. The accountant told him that he would owe around £80,000 in tax.

Brett Collins, Julie and Jeremy went out drinking together a frequently after the tragedy, Jeremy Bamber recently said in an interview with the Mirror Newspaper “I am certainly not alone in turning to alcohol in sorrow – nor in seeking the company of others who cared about me.” Brett tried to keep Jeremy’s spirits high with good humour and Jeremy even joined his friend, the twins father, Colin Caffell on the 9th of August where he, Jeremy, Julie, Brett and three others went for Chinese meal and then on to a concert as both Jeremy and Colin tried to put a brave face on their grief. [7]

Some weeks later after the tragedy, on the 23rd August, Jeremy attended the farm, he asked both Barbara Wilson and Jean Bouttell to clear out much of the clutter that filled up the rooms of White House Farm. This included a large collection of magazines in the kitchen under which Jean Bouttell found the spare telephone. She asked Jeremy what she should do with it he just remarked it was a spare.[8] There was much discussion over this telephone which was a court exhibit.

Jeremy had cheated on Julie Mugford with her friend Lizzie prior to the tragedies and he had also felt that his time with Julie had come to an end and broke of their relationship. Her endless demanding behaviour must have become tiresome for him; he had offered to buy Julie a wine bar in London and had given her money to help her as a student teacher. Jeremy wanted to be with another woman called Virginia whom he had known for some time. He turned to Virginia for comfort away from Julie’s violent tantrums and demands. [9] Julie was becoming more and more difficult and resented Brett Collins being around and suspected that they were lovers.

Brett had said he was experienced in the sale of antiques and together with Jeremy they took some valuables to Sotheby’s for auction to raise funds to help with the impending death duties much to the horror of the relatives. During the period before he was charged with the murders, Jeremy Bamber had twice headed overseas rejecting what had happened and feeling distressed at the constant press intrusion into his life.

After DCI Jones was removed as head of the investigation he worked under Supt Ainsley. DCI Jones had to arrest Jeremy Bamber the first time at Moorshead Mansions.  Almost immediately after his arrest and still at the flat Jeremy had blurted out that he had possession of Marijuana and handed some over to Jones.  At interview he easily confessed to burgling the caravan park to prove a point by using a key kept inside the letter box.  He also confessed to cultivating Marijuana in his back garden which he sold to friends.  For someone who owns up to crime so easily, it seems to me that if Jeremy Bamber had committed the killings he would not be able to stop himself from confessing.  Nevertheless, in 27 years there has never been any admission.

After his first arrest on the 8th of September, he was questioned for four days sometimes until 11pm at night. The interviews were not audio recorded but hand written each day, the first two days of questioning were held without Jeremy having a solicitor present. Police constantly pressed him on the positioning of the gun accusing him of telling some police officers that the rifle was on the table, but he was adamant the gun was on the settle.  DS Stan Jones asked him if he had or hadn’t fired the gun.  He was insistent that he had not fired the rifle.  They went over and over the telephone call from his father.  The records of these interviews span for hundreds of pages.  DS Jones told Jeremy that Julie had said that he had called her before calling the police which contradicted what both he and Julie had initially told police. The time of the call needed to be ‘fixed’ at a much earlier time for the prosecution to state that he called Julie first. This corresponds to PC West’s log having been recorded much earlier but he altered his testimony saying that he filled the log out wrong by ten minutes.

After days of questioning and with all the  confusion, Jeremy said that maybe he did call Julie first.  This single discrepancy was used against Jeremy although it actually has no real bearing on the facts; whether he called Julie first or the police second the events still happened just as he had said.  Since the interview Jeremy has maintained that he called the police before he called Julie.  There are no other discrepancies in Jeremy’s accounts throughout his 27 years. This single issue was used to state that Jeremy had lied. Jeremy Bamber’s account has stood up to scrutiny over 27 years and is very robust by comparison with the testimony of Mugford, who had lied about their engagement, the end of their relationship, Jeremy’s relationship with Collins, MacDonald being the hit man, her involvement in drugs and crime independently of Jeremy and her pre-trial deal with the News of the World for 25k.

Through all of the witness accounts, many people have altered their accounts and statements contradict each other, there is only one account which remains the same to this day and it is the account of Jeremy Bamber.  This is because it is the truth and the truth does not alter, other witnesses (both police officers and relatives) have exaggerated and embellished their original accounts in the media and to different police enquiries.  Jeremy has coped with the strain of the continual questioning and by comparison with other miscarriages of justice his version of accounts has not altered; he has never confessed nor altered his account under duress.

After his first arrest and release without charge Jeremy was approached by the newspapers for his story.  Naively he went to meet with one after his solicitor advised him against it.  But Jeremy was tired of being vilified by the newspapers after his arrest and wanted to tell his story.  Jeremy said that Brett Collins also advised that he should go to meet with the journalist. But the Sun journalist wasn’t interested in Jeremy’s account, and continually asked questions about Sheila Caffell and requested any modelling pictures which might have been pornographic.  Jeremy had told him that there were none and that there might have been some topless ones but Colin Caffell would have those.  The journalist ran the story reporting that the newspaper had been offered these pictures and they also went to the police. The newspaper never obtained pictures of Sheila, because they didn’t exist, further proof that Jeremy Bamber had not intended to sell any pictures to the newspaper.

Jeremy’s efforts to tell his story had gone disastrously wrong, this coupled with the burglary at the caravan park made the outlook very bleak.  Stories escalated about Jeremy’s relationship with Brett Collins and his trips abroad.  Acquaintances turned their backs on him and his often eccentric, foolish behaviour and socialising with homosexuals was amplified by local gossip.  His enjoyment of cannabis, later down classified to a class C drug and frequently used by the middle classes, was also a major point of 'criminality' used by the prosecution.  He was presented as having spent a lot of money on holidays but the reality was on his trip to Amsterdam he, Brett and Julie had shared the same room to economise.

After his arrest, the trip to the South of France was glamorised but the fact was that Jeremy and Brett stayed in a caravan to keep the costs low.  Anything to escape the now intrusive and destructive glare of the media. Jeremy was an innocent man subjected to similar treatment as other people who are vilified in the press, and subsequently released without charge.

Jeremy had continued smoking pot, taking prescribed sedatives[10] and alcohol to drown out the shock, pain and sorrow.  His arrest and high media profile prompted his new love Virginia to turn her back on him.   Julie had contrived a convoluted story to the police, and his relatives had turned against him and by their own admission, were taking belongings from his family home without permission.[11] Even Colin Caffell had become distant and had written to him saying that the relatives had insisted that Jeremy was duping him and was definitely guilty and Colin didn’t know what to believe now his beautiful twins were dead and Jeremy had been arrested and released without charge.[12]

Now Jeremy was in virtual exile in France with his friend Brett trying to support him in the only way he knew how, by leading him to drinking dens. After a short period under police surveillance the officers abandoned their suspect realising that Jeremy was not going to do anything helpful to the prosecution’s case.[13] Jeremy found the pain was dampened by drinking until the small hours and both he and Brett suffered with food poisoning on their return journey to the UK by ferry. Jeremy was arrested and charged with murder at the port of Dover.

On his arrival in a police van on his last day of freedom, there were several women  waving to him and calling out his name, he smiled back as the cameras snapped him in a dazed, exhausted blur of a mask which veiled the pain he would carry for at least another 27 years. This was a photograph often used over the years by the press to demonstrate that he was a shallow and arrogant young man.
                                                                       ***
'Truth cannot be found through facts alone, truth can only come through understanding'
 Jeremy Bamber, 2012


[1] Collective statements, J Mugford, A. Eaton, P. Eaton, B. Cock, B Collins
[2] Medical records, J Bamber
[3] 25th September, 1985, Police action 769, interview T. Wilson, Solicitor
[4] 3rd July 1991, Statement, T Wilson, Solicitor
[5] 16th September 1985, Statement, A Eaton
[6] Nevill Bamber statement of Estate & Ann Eaton Statement IBID
[7] 17th November, 1985, Statement, J Mugford
[8] Trial Transcript & Statements, J Bouttell
[9] 8th September 1985, Statement, J Mugford
[10] Medical records of Jeremy Bamber
[11] Ann Eaton Statement to COLP
[12] 17th September 1985,Letter to Jeremy from Colin Caffell
[13] Officer’s report Surveillance on JB
 
 

Saturday, 19 January 2013

Jeremy Bamber: My latest letter to MP John Whittingdale


Address provided



16 January 2013



John Whittingdale MP

House of Commons

London

SW1A 0AA



Dear Mr Whittingdale,


Re: Jeremy Bamber


I refer to your letter dated 14 January 2013. Whilst it is a fact that any conviction may only be overturned by the Court of Appeal it does not exclude any MP from bringing the concern before Parliament even to the extent of requesting intervention. You state that 'neither I nor Parliament has any influence over the matter' yet as I wrote in my previous letter to yourself, Andrew Hunter felt able to address Parliament regarding the injustice in Jeremy Bamber's case. You have also previously spoken about Jeremy Bamber in Parliament, in 2001, by asking a question in the House of Commons regarding whether Jeremy’s website should be allowed to exist. Both the above may be viewed as attempting to influence Parliament. Recently Parliamentary influence resulted in the money-guzzling Leveson Inquiry, held, in the main, as a result of media-attention-seeking celebs complaining when the same back-fired.
 

Through his access to files previously intended for PII and inadvertently sent to him, Jeremy Bamber can prove beyond doubt that he is innocent. There are hundreds of examples but a few here; no forensics implicating Jeremy in any part of the crime were found on the cycle he was supposed to have used as a getaway vehicle – photographs of the window from which he was supposed to have exited White House Farm show it was locked from the inside and photographs taken three weeks after the murders show flakes of red paint on the kitchen floor and scratches to the mantle which were not present in the original scene-of-crime photographs taken on the day of the murders. How did that happen? The silencer (sound moderator) was pivotal in convicting Jeremy, with the trial judge telling the jury they could convict him 'on the evidence of the silencer alone' but recently discovered photographs of the marks on Nevill Bamber's body show that they match more precisely the shape and dimensions of the gun muzzle and not the shape and dimensions of the silencer, yet the CCRC continue to deny the significance of these along with many other examples of tampering with evidence and refuse to refer back to the Court of Appeal. One can only question why? 
 

My motivation is not only that I believe Jeremy is innocent, but that this injustice could happen to me or one of mine or even one of yours. I once would have placed my faith in the integrity of our Criminal Justice System but over the years many cases of police corruption and cover-up have been exposed including Eddie Gilfoyle, Hillsborough, and more recently the Chief Whip Andrew Mitchell altercation.

 
Jeremy Bamber's conviction was brought about by a deliberate and successful attempt to pervert the course of justice at his trial and continues via, in my opinion, the collusion of some who have a vested interest in keeping the truth from being exposed.


Jeremy has over thirty lever-arch files in his cell, containing documents destined for PII. He has scrutinised thousands of them and has found hundreds of pieces of evidence showing how Essex Police and others perverted the course of justice. I have copies. Why would he spend twenty seven years trying to prove his innocence if it were not so? It cannot be an easy task. Jeremy has passed a lie detector test which was refused him until 2007 and had over twenty five tests for psychopathy, all negative. He can do no more – it is time for the guilty to be brought to justice and for justice to be seen to be done.


Jeremy's Campaign Team are not weirdos or crackpots or conspiracy junkies; they are intelligent, caring, informed and enlightened people and there are many more like them. Public support for Jeremy grows daily and I take comfort in the fact that when our politicians refuse to address corruption and injustice it is often public opinion which enforces change. Jeremy hangs on to his father's words, 'Don't worry Jeremy, the truth always comes out in the wash'.

I will keep you informed, at least I can say I tried and if-and-when the truth does come out, you can never say, you did not know.

 
Yours sincerely,





cc. Nick Clegg Deputy Prime Minister

 

Monday, 7 January 2013

Jeremy Bamber: PS Bews and PC Myall must own up...

 
To cover up....
 
The following is taken from the media pack on Jeremy Bamber's official website:        (edits in italics: Poppy Ann Miller)

3. Signs of life inside White House Farm:

 
a) PS Bews, PC Myall and Jeremy saw someone in the master bedroom at 04:00am. After the reconnaissance of the house and the sighting of someone in the master bedroom, all three ran back to the radio car, where PS Bews made a situation report to HQ over the radio asking for armed assistance.

At Jeremy's trial PS Bews denied that someone was seen in the master bedroom and has subsequently given press interviews and appeared on television repeating his claims that what he saw was a shadow or a trick of the light.

Essex Police have not disclosed a copy of this situation report, nor disclosed the audio recordings of all the radio messages from this incident which would have seemingly aided the prosecution.

b) Firearms officers tasked with specifically keeping watch on the master bedroom window state that at 07:00 am the curtains were closed. At 07:30 am a different police officer took over and reported that the curtains had been opened and the bedroom light was on. This person who had been seen by three people at 04:00am was likely the same person who closed the bedroom curtains prior to 07:00am, and opened them at some point between 07:00 and 07:30 am.

c) At the scene before police broke down the door two independent officers in different locations saw what they thought was a weapon in an upstairs bedroom window.
This weapon was not present when police broke in, any photographs taken of this room have not been disclosed to the Defence. 

All statements are supported with documentary evidence.

Visit:   http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/
 

Friday, 14 December 2012

Jermy Bamber: Appeal rejection

Although I despise the negative terminology used in regard to Jeremy in much of the press, I do believe that public opinion is valuable and whilst Jeremy remains in the media there is hope that people will read the real evidence which shows beyond all doubt that Jeremy could not have committed the murders for which he has been unjustly imprisoned for twenty seven years.

In order to change public opinion, first you have to gain their attention.

 Poppy Ann Miller

 

Tolleshunt D'Arcy: Bamber vows to fight on after latest appeal rejection

Tolleshunt D'Arcy: Bamber vows to fight on after latest appeal rejection Tolleshunt D'Arcy: Bamber vows to fight on after latest appeal rejection 
              
Jeremy Bamber has vowed to fight on after losing a High Court bid to have his case reviewed.
Bamber, 51, was jailed for life in 1986 for the murders of his parents June and Nevill, his adopted sister Sheila Caffell, 27, and her twin sons Nicholas and Daniel at the family farm in Tolleshunt D’Arcy.

Bamber has always protested his innocence claiming it was Sheila, who was a schizophrenic, who killed the family before turning the gun on herself.

Bamber is calling for a third appeal against his conviction.

However, the Criminal Cases Review Commission refused to refer his application.

Bamber’s legal team challenged the decision and applied for permission to seek a judicial review.

However, last Thursday, at the High Court, his application was refused by Sir John Thomas, president of the Queen's Bench Division, and Mr Justice Globe.

SEE THE STANDARD FOR THE FULL STORY
http://www.essexcountystandard.co.uk/search/?page=1&searchpattern=Jeremy+Bamber
 

Sunday, 3 June 2012

Police Corruption: Failures in convictions....


News
Written by Criminal Law and Justice Weekly   
Saturday, 02 June 2012 00:00
More than 8,500 allegations of police corruption over three years resulted in the conviction of only 13 police officers, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) has revealed, as it called for greater investigation powers. 
In the three years to 2011, there were 8,542 allegations of police corruption across all forces in England and Wales. Of those, 837 cases were referred to the IPCC. The IPCC then took a direct role in 104 cases, eventually referring 47 to the CPS, as a result of which 18 officers were charged and prosecuted, 13 were found guilty and 10 were imprisoned. 
Nearly two-thirds of the 837 cases related to perverting the course of justice or theft and fraud. As a result of the IPCC investigations, a further 76 officers were found guilty of gross misconduct or misconduct, but only 14 were dismissed.
The IPCC said discussions are under way with Home Office officials to secure 'the additional powers necessary to enable … the most effective corruption-related investigations', among them the ability to gain access to data held by third parties and investigate contracted-out employees.
In her foreword to the IPCC report, Dame Anne Owers, Chair of the IPCC, noted that 'the public is understandably doubtful about the extent to which … the police can investigate themselves' but emphasised that 'corruption is not widespread, or considered to be widespread'......

Oh really......?

Saturday, 26 May 2012

Jeremy Bamber: How Police and Scientists Colluded....



To corrupt evidence.....

A)     In 1991, the City of London Police (COLP) were requested by JEREMY BAMBER to investigate the following issues:
‘Allegation One’: that there was no Exhibit Label for the sound moderator SBJ/1 from the original Police investigation, case number SC/688/85, when it was tendered in Court.
‘Allegation Five’: that Essex Police failed to investigate whether the sound moderator tendered in evidence at trial was the moderator bought for the murder weapon.
B)     On completion of the COLP enquiry two reports were produced. The published report concluded there was no case to answer to any of the complaints made by JEREMY BAMBER against Essex Police.  While the undisclosed confidential report found as fact that fabricated evidence had been adduced to impugn the credibility of Jeremy Bamber thus resulting in a guilty verdict at his trial in 1986.

The Evidence

1)   That an Essex Police Officer, probably DS 21 Stanley Brian Jones, seized a sound moderator SBJ/1 from the gun cupboard at White House Farm (WHF) on 7th August 1985.
2)      Indeed this is corroborated by Assistant Chief Constable (ACC) PETER SIMPSON stating in a press conference and reported in ‘The Echo’ dated 17th September 1985,
‘A silencer was found at the White House Farm on the day of the killings, but this does not have to mean anything suspicious.’ (See Material Exhibits File News clippings)
3)      And yet in a letter, dated 18th July 2002, from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to Glaisyers Solicitors, PAUL CLOSE states that the beginning of the audio tape in question as to the above interview has a considerable section of the tape missing, when Essex Police disclosed it, (see Letter To Ewen Smith from CPS)
4)      The beginning of the interview would have evidenced that the sound moderator SBJ/1 was in fact seized on the 7th August 1985, which would have impugned the Crown’s case against JEREMY BAMBER at trial and appeal.
5)      Other documents that evidence the above allegations will be identified throughout this statement using the ‘HOLMES 2’ computer reference numbers from ‘ACCOUNT A 49.’
6)      It is fact that COLP interviewed Scenes of Crime Officer (SOCO) DS 219 DAVIDSON on 3rd October 1991, (HOLMES 76/174).  In the précis of his statement at paragraph 17 he asserts that on the 9th August 1985, he was tasked with examining a number of objects including a sound moderator, (SBJ/1).
7)      On the 13th August 1985, DI RON COOK submitted this sound moderator SBJ/1, to Huntingdon Forensic Laboratory for examination by scientists, GLYNNIS HOWARD and LESLIE TUCKER, (see HOLMES 67/319 – GLYNNIS HOWARD statement 1st August 1991).          
8)      See the HOLAB 3, Submission of Articles for Examination Forms, dated 13th August 1985, (See Holab Forms 1,2,3,4,5) reference the sound moderator, ‘Item 22’ and ‘Item 23’, ‘SBJ/1,’ ‘DB/1,’ and ‘DRB/1,’ with the police investigation case number as ‘SC/688/85.’
9)      GLYNNIS HOWARD’S witness statement for the 13th November 1985, details that she tested blood on the inside and outside of the sound moderator DRB/1, and in both cases the blood was found to be of human origin, (Holmes 8/224)
While a letter from PETER WINGAD to DR, SCAPLEHORN states, ‘There was no record of blood being seen on the outside of the sound moderator,’ (see HOLMES 78/24). PETER WINGAD wrote this letter in his capacity as Head of the Forensic Laboratory.  While GLYNNIS HOWARD simply stated in Court at trial, that she had found blood on the outside of the sound moderator, (see GLYNNIS HOWARD’S Trial Transcript), therefore lack of corroboration is in issue.
10)  LESLIE TUCKER states in her 1st August 1991 testimony to COLP that she assisted GLYNNIS HOWARD on the 13th August 1985, (see HOLMES 67/321). Indeed, LESLIE TUCKER took notes and made a diagram of SBJ/1, (EXHIBIT REF GH/1).
In her testimony she states,
‘GH/1 has other notes upon it not made by me. These appear to be made by JOHN HAYWARD and ANDREW PALMER. These notes were not made on 13th August 1985. I am not aware of when they were added.’
11)  Four signatures appear on the General Examination Record made at Bench 4 on the 13th August 1985, they are LESLIE TUCKER, GLYNNIS HOWARD, MALCOLM FLETCHER and JOHN HAYWARD.  However, the General Examination Record does not corroborate that of the original sound moderator seized SBJ/1, because this document, the one bearing all four signatures refers to the forensic reference number as DB/1. It can now be evidenced that this reference did not in fact exist until 17th October 1985.  Thus the General Examination Record cannot be the original one created by LESLIE TUCKER on 13th August 1985, (see GENERAL EXAMINATION RECORD DB/1).
12)  The original sound moderator first discovered was assigned the reference number SBJ/1 on the 13th August 1985.  A Memo from  DI COOK to MALCOLM FLETCHER states,
‘Change sound moderators number to DB/1,’ (see HOLMES 67/241 MEMO dated 17th October 1985).
13)  GLYNNIS HOWARD testified to COLP in her witness statement dated 10th July 1991,
‘I did not have any further contact with DI COOK on the matter, or with Essex Police due to my sick leave,’ (see HOLMES 67/318).
14)  This is corroborated in a report by DR. WINGAD attached to a Memo from  DR. THOMPSON  to  DR. CLARKE  which clearly states,
‘To complicate the issue GLYNNIS HOWARD has been on long-term sick leave since January of this year,’ (see HOLMES 87/3).
15)  How is it that GLYNNIS HOWARD has signed a General Examination Record for a sound moderator DB/1 on the 13th August 1985, when the General Examination Record she signed was in fact referenced SBJ/1?(see paragraph 8).
16)  Furthermore, GLYNNIS HOWARD asserted in her testimony to COLP dated 1st August 1991 that when she examined SBJ/1 on the 13th August 1985, she discovered five stains on the sound moderator, (see HOLMES 67/319).  Four of these stains proved to positively identify human blood, while she tested a fifth stain on the flat surface on the muzzle end of the sound moderator, and identified this as a smear of red paint.
17)  GLYNNIS HOWARD failed to record her discovery of a smear of red paint on the end of the sound moderator in her Memo to DI COOK, dated 14th August 1985, or indeed in her numerous pre-trial witness statements and during her trial testimony.  It was not until 1991 that GLYNNIS HOWARD asserted this relevant discovery, in view of the facts turning on there being a fight in the kitchen at WHF, scraping the mantel shelf around the Aga. (See Holmes 67.318)
18)  Indeed, LESLIE TUCKER corroborates this as she has drawn a smear of red paint on the end of the sound moderator at the 9 o’clock position, (see EXHIBIT GH/1).  Thus it is relevant that on the General Examination Record depicting DB/1 and not SBJ/1, as the sound moderator in issue, the identifying smear of red paint is not recorded.
19)  The existence of this smear and it being deemed at the time materially relevant by the scientists is corroborated by JOHN HAYWARD in his hand written witness statement signed 8th November 1985, where he asserts that he examined SBJ/1 and that,
‘There is a smear of red paint at the muzzle end of the sound moderator,’ (see HOLMES 67/100 PDF page 7).
20)  Indeed JOHN HAYWARD took it upon himself to take a number of photographic images of the sound moderator SBJ/1, when he examined and dismantled it on the 12th September 1985.  These images are referred to as reference JH/1. See also document 80/10 reference 24J – 6 X Photo albums of silencers, and 24w – 7 X albums of photographs re silencer.
21)  Moreover, BRIAN ELLIOT was shown these photographs by COLP, (see BRIAN ELLIOT’S witness statement dated 3rd October 1991, HOLMES 67/322).  These images taken on the 12th September 1985 that are undeniably relevant evidence have never been tendered to the Defence in any event.  Similarly those photographs of silencers mentioned in document 80/10 remain undisclosed.
22)  In 2002, a third Police enquiry was undertaken to investigate the actions of Essex Police in the STOKENCHURCH enquiry.  A number of issues were found as fact.
23)  Action Number A204 states:
‘Examine paint on moderator to establish if there is paint thereon.’
‘FSS to examine paint stain (one) on moderator to establish if there are any blood stains underneath the paint marks.’
Result, 20/02/02:
‘The underside of the paint and the exposed area left on the moderator were tested for the presence of blood. The results were negative.’
24)  In 2002, STOKENCHURCH asked the FSS to examine sound moderator SBJ/1 that had a smear of red paint on the flat surface of the muzzle end.  Sound moderator DB/1 had been found as fact to have numerous red paint flakes impacted upon the knurled pattern, and no smear of red paint on the end of the flat surface, thereby establishing the difference between SBJ/1 and DB/1.
25)  COLP misled the Home Secretary at the time, in their published report submitted to him where they state,
‘That the sound moderator should have been photographed at the earliest opportunity.  Unfortunately this did not happen.  The earliest photographs taken of the sound moderator were taken on the 11th November 1985,’ (see COLP Report, paragraph 2/57). It can now be evidenced that this statement lacks credibility.
26)  MALCOLM FLETCHER was sent a number of photographs taken of the dismantled sound moderator by DI RON COOK, (see HOLMES 78/14).  These images had been taken by DI RON COOK at Chelmsford HQ Scenes of Crime Department on 21st August 1985, (see Holmes 8/215 DI RON COOK’S 25th September 1991 Witness Statement PDF page 33).
27)  It remains to be disclosed whether JOHN HAYWARD was aware when he examined SBJ/1 on 12th September 1985, that SBJ/1 had been dismantled in the first instance and had its baffle plates spread out upon a work bench where a blood stained rifle had been placed for convenience at the same time, possibly corrupting its evidential integrity.
28)  JOHN HAYWARD stated that he discovered a single flake of blood inside the sound moderator that he used in all his blood grouping tests, the question remains was he aware of the images that MALCOLM FLETCHER had in his possession as to the real possibility of contamination of SBJ/1 by the rifle when he examined it? (see HOLMES 78/14)
29)  Both JOHN HAYWARD and GLYNNIS HOWARD gave testimony as expert witnesses at trial.  They stated that they had screened the blood stains discovered on the sound moderator SBJ/1, to discern whether they were of human or animal origin.  The Jury were instructed by the two of them, that the blood tested did not originate from an animal but was in fact human.
30)  JOHN HAYWARD and GLYNNIS HOWARD failed to inform the Jury that they in fact screened the blood for two types of animal – dog and hen, (see HOLMES 12/194 PDF page 5) but the .22 rifle in issue (Exhibit DRH/15), was used to shoot rabbits, foxes and rats.  No evidence has been submitted to Huntingdon Forensic Laboratory to suggest that the sound moderator was ever used to shoot hens or dogs.  Why then select these two animal types as possible sources of the blood staining on the sound moderator SBJ/1? Indeed, why did JOHN HAYWARD and GLYNNIS HOWARD fail to inform the Jury that they had not tested the blood for obvious farm pests such as foxes, rabbits and rats but instead for hens and dogs?
31)  In 1986, on the basis of their expert testimony the Jury were led to believe that all types of animal screening had been undertaken, with a negative result, thus their credibility is in issue.
32)  Had it been brought to the Jury’s attention that the sound moderator could well have been contaminated with rabbit blood, then the Defence would have been able to rebut the prosecution’s proposition and illustrate that the positive result for AK/1 an enzyme attributed to Sheila Caffell, as asserted by JOHN HAYWARD, could also be attributed to the AK/1 enzyme found in all rabbit blood (see R-10).
33)  Moreover, on the 25th September 1985, BRIAN ELLIOT was prima facie given ‘SBJ/1’ to examine including the smear of red paint on the flat surface on the muzzle end, as discovered by GLYNNIS HOWARD and JOHN HAYWARD, (see HOLMES 67/319, HOLMES 67/100).
34)  BRIAN ELLIOT instead found a large quantity of red paint flakes impacted into the knurled end of the sound moderator, and no smear of red paint adhering to the surface of the flat end piece.  At the time BRIAN ELLIOT believed he was examining SBJ/1 due to its packaging and labelling, however this sound moderator was in fact DB/1.  This fact can be corroborated by BRIAN ELLIOT’S realisation in 1991 when he was shown JOHN HAYWARD’S photographs by COLP of SBJ/1, (see HOLMES 67/322, statement dated 3rd October 1991).
35)  Indeed, the sound moderator in photos JH/1 had blood in the dips and the grooves of its knurled pattern (see GLYNNIS HOWARD’S Trial Transcript).  These photographs had none of the twenty-five plus red paint flakes that BRIAN ELLIOT found in the dips and grooves of the knurl, and as evidenced in his trial testimony he found no blood in the sound moderator’s knurl (see BRIAN ELLIOT’S Trial Transcript).
36)  The diagrams drawn by BRIAN ELLIOT and LOUISE FLOAT on the 25th September 1985 shows that the sound moderator had a large piece of sticky tape adhering to it that was not present when JOHN  HAYWARD examined it, and then photographed it on 12th September 1985, (see HOLMES 67/193).
37)  It is fact that the sound moderator SBJ/1, also had a white film of super glue covering its outer surface owing to the fingerprinting process undertaken on the 15th August 1985.
38)  But DB/1, the sound moderator examined by BRIAN ELLIOT and LOUISE FLOAT did not have such a white film on its outer surface.
39)  Indeed DB/1 was found in the same gun cupboard as SBJ/1 by DAVID BOUTFLOUR on the 10th August 1985.  It then remained in a card board box at his sister, ANN EATON’S house until 11th September 1985, (see P35).  It was then collected by DC OAKEY on 11th September 1985 and handed to DCI WRIGHT SOC Chelmsford.
40)  On the 12th September 1985 DI COOK and DC BIRD attended WHF to take photographic images of scratch marks on the underside of the kitchen’s mantel shelf.  On that same day they also took photographs of the kitchen in its tidied state, (see Police Reference Number Negative Strip YELLOW LABEL – 34, NEGATIVES 7-10, these appear in the Master Copy Album as Photographs Numbers 148, 149, 150, and 151).
41)  It can be clearly seen from NEGATIVE NUMBER 7 of YL-34 that it is an area of red painted surround to the left of the cooker (at waist height), it can be seen to be free of scratch marks or chips/gouges in the red paint work.
42)  While it can be seen that NEGATIVE NUMBER 9, of YL-34 shows the same area of this red painted Aga surround, when this area is enlarged it shows that the left hand vertical fascia at (waist height) now has a deep ‘U’ shape, white coloured scratch mark upon it.  Also, near the ‘U’ shaped scratch mark is a deep, white coloured gouge in an area of the small cupboard door.  This area on the cupboard door was previously covered by the kitchen calendar in the crime scene photographs.
43)  These two distinct marks must have been made either by DC BIRD and/or DI RON COOK, as no other person was present at WHF on the 12th September 1985.  NEGATIVE NUMBER 7 of YL-34, has been taken in a chronological order and is taken prior to NEGATIVE NUMBER 9 of YL – 34, therefore it is logical to assume that these later marks were gouged using the sound moderator DB/1.  Indeed there were over twenty-five flakes of red paint upon DB/1 which would corroborate an intensity of impact upon the Aga surround by the sound moderator and the depth of the mark made, that was later used to bolster the prosecution’s proposition.
44)  In 1991, DR. BAXENDALE, using ESDA testing, was requested by COLP to examine the Exhibit Labels for the sound moderator SBJ/1 (Exhibit Label AH/1), (see HOLMES 24/170).
45)  Indeed, DR. BAXENDALE’s 23rd September 1991, witness statement shows clearly that he found as fact that the Exhibit Label signed by GLYNNIS HOWARD, DI RON COOK, JOHN HAYWARD, MALCOLM FLETCHER and BRIAN ELLIOT was originally written out specifically for sound moderator DRB/1, case reference number SC/786/85, (see HOLMES 6/109).
46)  While GLYNNIS HOWARD testified to COLP that she only signed one Exhibit Label for the sound moderator SBJ/1 on 13th August 1985, case number SC/688/85.  Furthermore, she stated that the Exhibit Label shown to her by COLP bearing her signature, (AH/1) shows that SBJ/1 had been changed to DB/1 then DRB/1 subsequent to her signing it, (see HOLMES REF 67/320).  This clearly contradicts the findings of the expert witness DR. BAXENDALE and impugns GLYNNIS HOWARD’s credibility.
47)  Moreover, COLP were aware of his findings from his 23rd September 1991 Witness Statement, and that GLYNNIS HOWARD was not a credible witness due to what she stated on 3rd October 1991.  Instead GLYNNIS HOWARD signed a new Exhibit Label for DRB/1, a sound moderator she had neither seen nor examined for case reference SC/786/85.  To create a false Exhibit Label in order to mislead a Jury is to pervert the course of justice.  JOHN HAYWARD was never interviewed by COLP in 1991.  He has not explained how his signature came to be on the exhibit label marked DRB/1 when he examined SBJ/1.
48)  It may be fact that Essex Police misled Huntingdon’s Forensic Scientists into creating a new set of examination documents and a new Exhibit Label for DRB/1, without them realising that they were facilitating SBJ/1 being swapped for DB/1 and then being merged evidentially to form a third fictional sound moderator, as being the one removed from WHF.
49)  However, it is believed that Essex Police had at least one Forensic Scientist who conspired to help switch SBJ/1 to DB/1 prior to BRIAN ELLIOT’s 25th September 1985 examination.  Unless an admission is made by the scientist in question their identity will remain concealed.  Indeed it is not known how much of the information provided thus far the scientists in question were aware of in 1985 and 1991.  Yet there are over one hundred additional documents that contain information corroborating and evidencing all the above facts.
50)  In any event, the Defence request a full account as to how it was that Essex Police instructed Huntingdon Forensic Scientists to fabricate a set of false documents, purporting to follow a chain of evidence that bolstered the credibility of an exhibit item, for a sound moderator DRB/1, which it is fact was fictional.  This ‘sound moderator’ DRB/1, was used to mislead the Jury in 1986 by merging the forensic evidence of two sound moderators SBJ/1 and DB/1, resulting in a miscarriage of justice.
51)  It is considered that complicity and lack of credibility by certain scientists as adduced by other expert witnesses not involved in the trial at first instance, i.e. DR. BAXENDALE, in addition to the documents now in the hands of the Defence, suggests the mens rea regarding the offence of perverting the course of justice.
Conclusion
It is only now twenty-six years later, that JEREMY BAMBER’s Defence team were eventually disclosed case photographs and documents previously withheld under Public Immunity Interest.  This evidence clearly shows that the Jury were misled regarding the provenance of the sound moderator material to the facts of the prosecution’s case.  In addition to it being corrupted and fabricated as to its identity in any event.
The Huntingdon Forensic Scientists had a duty and obligation to make accountable to the Court at the time of trial as to the re-writing and signing of numerous sets of documents, including the Exhibit Label for alternative sound moderators.  The fact that they did not and indeed in two instances at least, committed perjury during the COLP enquiry allowed Essex Police to pervert the course of justice by fabricating it as fact that only one sound moderator featured in the case.
ACC SIMPSON himself was aware that two sound moderators featured in the evidence of the case and that the Jury were misled by the tainting of evidence as facilitated by the Forensic Scientists named in this document.  None of the expert witnesses who were in a position of trust, or serving Police Officers tendered evidence that actually illustrated the truth of the facts as shown in this document. This resulted in the jury being misled in 1986.




Saturday, 8 October 2011

Justice4Jeremy: Evidence of Collusion

Much of the tainting of Jeremy Bamber’s trial was conducted around a second sound moderator (gun silencer) which was introduced by Jeremy’s relatives over a month after the crime was committed.  Instead of questioning this sudden appearance Essex Police and others chose instead, to collude with it.
Documents intended for Public Interest Immunity (PII) were ‘inadvertently’ sent to Jeremy.  PII is a principle of common law under which English courts can grant an Order allowing one litigant to keep evidence from the sight of the other litigants if they consider disclosure to be damaging to public interest.  So it is clear that the plan was for these documents to be buried, safely out-of-sight, intended never to see the light-of-day

Jeremy’s most recent sixteen page letter to me provides an in-depth account of what he has found within these documents.  Jeremy’s letters are handwritten.  He writes in detail including reference and exhibit numbers revealing proof of what he has always maintained – his innocence.  Details of documents which evidence beyond dispute the existence of two sound moderators and the ‘losing’, editing and re-writing of crucial evidence.  Jeremy has given me permission to reveal his entire letter and the corruption of documents which he has discovered.  I shall not record it all here though will forward relevant information to the City of London Police (COLP), the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) and the Home Secretary.

For those of us who believe that the administrators of justice in our so-called Great Britain, would not comprehend such malpractice and deceit, Jeremy states on more than one occasion, ‘I have the documents to prove it’. 

The following are direct quotes from Jeremy’s letter and for brevity I have paraphrased others.

‘COLP (City of London Police) discovered that Glynis Howard and her assistant Leslie Tucker; John Hayward and his assistant, Andrew Palmer; Brian Elliott and his assistant, Louise Float and Malcolm Fletcher all signed a set of falsified documents for a second sound moderator to create a chain of evidence paper trail capable of deceiving the jury and it did.......I have their lab notes.’
‘They(sound moderators) are both the same, Parker-Hale MM1 type and someone simply took SBJ/1 out of its cardboard tube packaging and slipped in DB/1 that had been contaminated with red paint from the scene.
‘And in any event they admitted this to COLP in 1991 but COLP and Essex Police just covered it up under PII.  John Hayward took photos of SBJ/1 on 12th Sept ’85, well him and his assistant Andrew Palmer, COLP showed these photos to Brian Elliott in 1991 and asked, “Is that the same sound moderator you examined?” 
Elliott replies indicating that he did not accept it could be the same sound moderator and provides an explanation as to why that is the case, including a description of how the sound moderator he examined differed from the one in the photo in relation to the positioning of red paint on it.
‘Everyone examined the sound moderator under a  microscope as well as by eye and it’s clear that the first one SBJ/1 had blood on it and this smear of red paint and the second one DB/1 was switched with SBJ/1 after being sent to the lab on 20/Sept/85.’
‘I can prove every word of the above – I have all the PII primary documents showing exactly how my relatives and Essex Police and the forensic scientists at Huntingdon and COLP and PCA (now the IPCC) all worked together to either directly corrupt the sound moderator evidence or actively assisted in concealing that Essex Police found SBJ/1 and it was switched between 20th and 25th Sept ’85 at Huntingdon Forensic Laboratory with DB/1 that had been used to scratch and score the kitchen mantle shelf at White House Farm to falsely implicate me as a murderer. ....I have the documents showing that it was.......These are the document references: Exhibit signed by Glynis Howard, Malcolm Fletched, John Hayward and Brian Elliott:- ‘Police Crime Number’ SC/786/85, ‘Description of Article ‘Silencer’ DB/1, crossed out, and DRB/1 in brackets:- Serial Number 22, as the identification marker.’
Jeremy has no doubt that lawyers, judiciary as well as the Home Office must have known about this; and what about the media?  Considering the damage much of the press did in promulgating biased views, influencing public opinion through their coverage of Jeremy’s case, I wonder if they will attempt to compensate in some small way by publishing this evidence?  The truth!  Though I appreciate it might be difficult for them to recognise the truth 'even if it jumped up and bit them!'
I feel it reprehensible that those to whom we look for justice would rather lie and deceive than admit they were wrong.  That those who set themselves up in public office as upholders of the 'Law', can collude to send an innocent man to prison and then leave him there for TWENTY SIX YEARS rather than face up to their own shortcomings.
It doesn’t bear thinking about and maybe some people would rather not think about the enormity of the true crime here.  Heartbreaking.
I do not believe there is a Heaven for the just and a Hell for the unjust but for one brief moment there I wished there were!

'Crimes that Shook Britain' Jeremy Bamber. View here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lE9gcRGJrKE