Jeremy Bamber: Justice perverted by police

From the date of the murders in 1985 at White House Farm, Pages Lane, Tollesbury, Essex, it appears, upon reading the documents which have since come to light, that some Essex Police officers conspired to pervert the course of justice by altering statements, forensics and call logs, thus convincing all but two of the jury at Jeremy Bamber's trial, that he was guilty. And now after thirty years and despite the disclosure of thousands more documents evidencing this, they have not the humility or the humanity to own up and admit, 'it's a fair cop', thereby enabling Jeremy to spend the rest of his life as the free man he has the right to be.

 For more documents showing how Jeremy's, then girlfriend, Julie Mugford (now Smerchanski and living in Winnipeg, Canada) colluded with the police and lied in her statements as well as the part Jeremy's relatives, Ann Eaton and Robert Boutflour played in fostering Jeremy's guilt, please visit the site: http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/

As a prisoner Jeremy has no civil rights so has had to suffer the lies fostered by some media, and outrageous, malicious and false TV programmes, along with books written by those who just want to make a buck out of an innocent man who cannot fight back. But we have civil rights and as such can fight to bring to light what must be the gravest miscarriage of justice ever in the UK.

Hearing from his supporters really encourages Jeremy and gives him hope. Write to:
Jeremy N Bamber, A5352AC, HM Full Sutton, York, Y041 1PS or email him using www.emailaprisoner.com with NOMS number A5352AC

Jeremy Bamber: L Ellis Media Hub

'Stan should keep regurgitated views to himself'

By This is Essex  |  Posted: August 19, 2010

• SHARE PICTURE

Copy link to paste in your message

CONTROVERSIAL: Stan Jones's views in last week's Chronicle

Comments (0) FORMER Detective Sergeant Stan Jones accuses Jeremy Bamber of continually raking over old ground.
Mr Jones could well be accused of singing the same old song himself. His constantly regurgitated gut-feeling about Bamber proves nothing. He says that Bamber consistently presents material which has already been discussed and adjudicated on in court. How can this be when so much has come to light since the trial that the defence team and jury were unaware of? The allegedly altered police logs, the photograph of Sheila Caffell's body still bleeding some eight hours after she was supposedly shot, the fact that only a small proportion of crime scene photographs were made available to the defence and the jury, the further DNA tests that suggest that the blood in the silencer was more likely to have been a mix of that of Nevill and June Bamber rather than Sheila Caffell's.
Mr Jones states that there was 'a pile of circumstantial evidence' that led to the conclusion that Bamber was guilty. Precisely – it was all circumstantial. There was not one bit of forensic evidence to prove that he committed the crime. In the case of the silencer, this had been contaminated to such a degree by the relatives and police it should never have been allowed as evidence.

 

The police have even backtracked on the contents of their own official logs made at the time, firstly regarding the statement that they had seen a figure moving within the house and secondly that they were in conversation with someone inside the house, both at times when Jeremy Bamber was outside the house with the police. They now say that their officers were 'mistaken' or the wording in the logs was 'misunderstood'. Conveniently, despite the knowledge that appeals against conviction were ongoing and likely to last for some time, Essex Police took it upon themselves to destroy all forensic evidence in 1996.
If I was Stan Jones, rather than continue to trot out the same old stuff I think in the circumstances I'd keep a low profile.
L Ellis
Maldon

Read more: Jeremy Bamber http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/News-Articles
http://www.essexchronicle.co.uk/Stan-regurgitated-views/story-12633337-detail/story.html#ixzz3XqTHMEe8

Jeremy Bamber: Media Hub

The Telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/7884046/Jeremy-Bamber-claims-he-was-framed-for-murder-by-cousins.html

Jeremy Bamber claims he was framed for murder by cousins

Jeremy Bamber has accused two of his cousins of manipulating the evidence that led to his conviction for murdering five relatives in one of Britain’s most notorious crimes.

n

l

Jeremy Bamber, who was jailed for life in 1986 for the murders of five members of his family at White House Farm in Essex Photo: PA

By Matthew Moore

7:30AM BST 12 Jul 2010

Bamber, who has served nearly 25 years of a life sentence for killing his adoptive parents, sister and her twin children, claims he was set up in a conspiracy to cut him out of the inheritance.

Bamber has always maintained his innocence and the Criminal Cases Review Commission is currently analysing photographic evidence which his supporters claim shows he cannot have been responsible for the rampage at his parents’ Essex farmhouse in 1985.

But his allegations against Ann Eaton and David Boutflour, made in his first full prison interview, represent the first time he has directly blamed other people for his plight.

Mr Boutflour yesterday dismissed the allegations as “absolute piffle” and said he and his sister had no reason to incriminate their cousin, who was described by the trial judge as “evil, almost beyond belief”.

Bamber, who is now 49, was found guilty of the murders after a rifle silencer covered in specks of blood, red paint and a single hair was found in a cupboard at White House Farm in the village of Tolleshunt D'Arcy days after the killing.

Related Articles

• 10 reasons given to back up claim Bamber is innocent
  11 Feb 2011
• Fresh doubt on Bamber conviction
  22 Feb 2010
• New opportunities in the property market
  Sponsored by Property Crowd

While police were initially convinced that Bamber’s sister Sheila had shot her adoptive parents Nevill and June and six-year-old twins Nicholas and Daniel before turning the gun on herself, the new discovery indicated that a third party must have carried out the spree before returning the silencer.
Jurors were also shown photos - taken one month after the killings - of scratch marks above the Aga in the family kitchen, indicating that Nevill had tussled with the gunman before being shot. The paint on the silencer matched that above the oven.
Bamber’s campaign for his conviction to be overturned is largely based on a recently-uncovered photo taken hours after the killings, which shows no sign of any scratches on the Aga mantlepiece, nor flecks of paint on the floor below.
Speaking to The Sunday Times yesterday, Bamber claimed that his cousins planted the silencer and scratched the paint in the weeks after the shootings, in a plan to frame him and secure ownership of the £400,000 family estate.
Bamber was disinherited after his conviction, and the estate passed to the Boutflours. Ann Eaton still lives at the property with her family.
Mr Boutflour rejected the claims as absurd and unfounded. He told the newspaper:: “I remember some things like it was yesterday. I remember finding the silencer.
“He’s suggesting that we fraudulently shoved the paint and the blood in to make it appear he had done it. Well that’s a load of rubbish. What would be the point? There was enough evidence anyway. What an absolute load of piffle.”
Mrs Eaton could not be contacted for comment yesterday, and has previously declined to speak to the press.
The Criminal Cases Review Commission, which investigates suspected miscarriages of justice, is expected to decide in the next few months whether to grant Bamber permission to take his case to the Court of Appeal.
He has already had two appeals against his conviction rejected. He is serving a whole-life tariff, meaning he will never be eligible for parole.

More articles on INNOCENT Jeremy Bamber; gravest miscarriage of justice in UK history
 http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/News-Articles