PoppyMeze

Showing posts with label IPCC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IPCC. Show all posts

Tuesday, 22 July 2014

About Jeremy Bamber

Many people may have heard of Jeremy Bamber; others support him and are familiar with his case and the outrageous miscarriage of justice.  Copied from Jeremy's website, I found the following helpful in providing some insight into Jeremy's background, friends and family.

Copyright ©Jeremy Bamber Campaign http://jeremybamber.org/jeremy-bamber/
The Author’s view                                                                                                        December 2011

This is not a direct account from Jeremy Bamber. It is my view on Jeremy and his circumstances written as author. I have been kindly granted access to all available evidence regarding Jeremy’s case including 130 lever arch files of papers, which has enabled me to build a picture of Jeremy during this period. I have also sourced various accounts from people who know Jeremy. It is from these documents that I have drawn my conclusions that Jeremy Bamber was an innocent man, wrongly convicted in the prime of his life. The character of Jeremy as I see it is one which contrasts with popular myth brought about by the media.

Background
Jeremy’s natural mother was 16 and lived in Scotland, and his father a young army recruit. His natural father was married at the time he was conceived and later divorced his wife to marry Jeremy’s natural mother. His father rose to be an Army General and I believe they are still married to this day, they also had more children together, Jeremy Bamber’s full brother and sister are called Justin Marsham and Sophie Marsham.

Jeremy was adopted through the church by June and Nevill Bamber who provided a kind and loving family, and Jeremy feels very fortunate to have grown up in this environment. He enjoyed life on the farm, had his own dog and learned the skill of farming from an early age. He loved Sheila despite them going their separate ways during their teenage years. Jeremy enjoys cultivating plants and he has expressed a desire to return to farming, though I think small scale farming would be on his agenda these days.

As a young man he went to the renowned Gresham College. Jeremy is intelligent, and is particularly interested in engineering, architecture, sculpture and physics. He has always enjoyed keeping fit and still goes to the gym every day he can, he is also interested in yoga and meditation. Jeremy didn’t pursue a degree after college but while in prison he has gained many educational qualifications and spends long hours working on his case as well attending the Brallie translation workshop.

Jeremy did not dress up as Adam Ant on the farm, contrary to popular belief, but was always smart and well presented when he wasn’t farming. He did go into London to meet up with friends and he saw Sheila every couple of weeks; he was friends with Colin Caffell and they got on well. Jeremy was definitely a ‘farmer’s boy’ who very much enjoyed that life style and wanted it to continue that way.

From 79-80 Jeremy spent time in Australia travelling. For 5 months he worked on a sugar plantation working with a family in Queensland; he really enjoyed employment for them on the farm and still speaks about their ingenious inventions of various types of machinery to harvest crops. At the end of that year he went to New Zealand and back to Australia a couple of times but for no great length of time. It has been suggested that Jeremy hated farming, if this was so then why did he work on a farm in Australia and not as a barman for example?
Last Day of Freedom
Coping with the tragedies at White House Farm

Everyone copes with trauma in different ways. Jeremy had been kept away from the house when the fire arms team were called in. He had been asked to stay in a police car on Pages Lane with officers, who testified that he was distressed, he kept looking as though he was going to break down and they distracted him with talk of other things. PC Lay stated in his 1st of October statement:
“There were two or three occasions during the conversation that Jeremy appeared to be getting upset. On one of these occasions he said, “Oh God, I hope she hasn’t done anything stupid.” I didn’t ask him to elaborate on that remark as the man was getting distressed and so I steered the conversation to another subject.”
Lay goes on to say:
“The Witham Duty Sergeant came over to the car. He went to the nearside and opened the passenger door and said – I’m very sorry there’s no hope for any of them.” Or words to that effect. At that Jeremy burst into tears and the sergeant tried to console him.”

Other officers detail in their statements that Jeremy was crying and was visibly upset and distressed. When the doctor arrived he gave him a sip of whiskey from a hip flask. This made Jeremy sick. When they took Jeremy to his home, police insisted he eat something to stop him from retching. He had little food in the house and went to the fridge, the only thing he could find was bacon which he put into the microwave and then into two pieces of bread, he ate this with the encouragement of the police officers and so is the kernel of the myth of the jolly Jeremy Bamber sitting at this kitchen table eating a hearty cooked breakfast with police officers.

Many of Jeremy’s responses have been used against him, for example, the talk of buying a Porsche was used as evidence to demonstrate that he was already planning to spend his inheritance on a new Sports car, but the truth was that Jeremy was referring to a buying a cheap kit Porsche. The case is littered with myths and circumstantial evidence. The facts are that there was no evidence against Jeremy Bamber; nothing connecting him to the scene. In court the moderator was the only thing suggesting that Sheila had not shot herself. She could not have fired one shot leaving her blood in the moderator and then taken the moderator downstairs and put it in the gun cupboard and gone back upstairs again where she was found. Even though this still did not connect Jeremy to the killings, the judge stated at court that because Jeremy said that his father had made the call to him – this would mean that it had to be either Jeremy or Sheila and not a third party. It does beg the question as to why there has been so much emphasis placed on the precarious evidence of Mugford and her hit man story which was demonstrably disproved. So, with absolutely no evidence – why is he in prison?

Jeremy Bamber let Julie Mugford and his friends and relatives take over the running of almost every part of the aftermath of the tragedy.[1] Unable to cope with entering White House Farm without experiencing trauma and severe anxiety Jeremy continued to smoke cannabis heavily, whilst drinking alcohol and taking diazepam as prescribed by his doctor. [2]

The question must have turned over in his mind a million times: If I hadn’t left the gun out on the settle would this still have happened?Had he forgotten to take the magazine out or not? No, he was sure he had taken the magazine out. Had Sheila noticed that he had left the gun like this? He had blamed himself for his own mistakes, but then the farm was full of guns, a collection of 7 weapons including rifles and shotguns were there and he knew that Sheila could have picked up any one of those at any time.

The family solicitor was later interviewed by police and confirmed that he had advised Jeremy to find out the order of deaths[3] something which was later to be used against him by his relatives and the police. Later when the City of London Police investigated, Mr Wilson told them that Jeremy was very emotional on his visits to him and that he had advised Jeremy that he should be appointed sole director of the businesses.[4]

A few days after the tragedy Jeremy had to face going into the farm, Ann Eaton took Jeremy around the house after she had been in to clean it and remove valuable items she wanted for herself and her family. She stated that he did not want to go into each room and she described Jeremy as “frightened, hesitant and petrified,” a normal reaction for someone having to face where the bodies of their family had been found. [5]

The family accountant had confirmed that Nevill’s bank account was overdrawn by almost £100,000; [6] all of the estate was tied up in assets. Nevill had borrowed this money to convert his estate in Guildford into five houses. Jeremy had the responsibility of running the farm at harvest time, coping with the funerals of his family, the shock, his grief and the prospect of having little money for funerals as well as paying staff wages. He was an inexperienced farmer at just 24 years old, and Basil Cock had advised that Jeremy appoint Peter Eaton as farm manager to help. Jeremy was also advised that death duties would be high and he would have to find ways of cutting down costs. At the time inheritance duties were 40% of all monies inherited over £200,000. The financial difficulty Jeremy faced was because he was to inherit both his parent’s estates at once. The accountant told him that he would owe around £80,000 in tax.

Brett Collins, Julie and Jeremy went out drinking together a frequently after the tragedy, Jeremy Bamber recently said in an interview with the Mirror Newspaper “I am certainly not alone in turning to alcohol in sorrow – nor in seeking the company of others who cared about me.” Brett tried to keep Jeremy’s spirits high with good humour and Jeremy even joined his friend, the twins father, Colin Caffell on the 9th of August where he, Jeremy, Julie, Brett and three others went for Chinese meal and then on to a concert as both Jeremy and Colin tried to put a brave face on their grief. [7]

Some weeks later after the tragedy, on the 23rd August, Jeremy attended the farm, he asked both Barbara Wilson and Jean Bouttell to clear out much of the clutter that filled up the rooms of White House Farm. This included a large collection of magazines in the kitchen under which Jean Bouttell found the spare telephone. She asked Jeremy what she should do with it he just remarked it was a spare.[8] There was much discussion over this telephone which was a court exhibit.

Jeremy had cheated on Julie Mugford with her friend Lizzie prior to the tragedies and he had also felt that his time with Julie had come to an end and broke of their relationship. Her endless demanding behaviour must have become tiresome for him; he had offered to buy Julie a wine bar in London and had given her money to help her as a student teacher. Jeremy wanted to be with another woman called Virginia whom he had known for some time. He turned to Virginia for comfort away from Julie’s violent tantrums and demands. [9] Julie was becoming more and more difficult and resented Brett Collins being around and suspected that they were lovers.

Brett had said he was experienced in the sale of antiques and together with Jeremy they took some valuables to Sotheby’s for auction to raise funds to help with the impending death duties much to the horror of the relatives. During the period before he was charged with the murders, Jeremy Bamber had twice headed overseas rejecting what had happened and feeling distressed at the constant press intrusion into his life.

After DCI Jones was removed as head of the investigation he worked under Supt Ainsley. DCI Jones had to arrest Jeremy Bamber the first time at Moorshead Mansions.  Almost immediately after his arrest and still at the flat Jeremy had blurted out that he had possession of Marijuana and handed some over to Jones.  At interview he easily confessed to burgling the caravan park to prove a point by using a key kept inside the letter box.  He also confessed to cultivating Marijuana in his back garden which he sold to friends.  For someone who owns up to crime so easily, it seems to me that if Jeremy Bamber had committed the killings he would not be able to stop himself from confessing.  Nevertheless, in 27 years there has never been any admission.

After his first arrest on the 8th of September, he was questioned for four days sometimes until 11pm at night. The interviews were not audio recorded but hand written each day, the first two days of questioning were held without Jeremy having a solicitor present. Police constantly pressed him on the positioning of the gun accusing him of telling some police officers that the rifle was on the table, but he was adamant the gun was on the settle.  DS Stan Jones asked him if he had or hadn’t fired the gun.  He was insistent that he had not fired the rifle.  They went over and over the telephone call from his father.  The records of these interviews span for hundreds of pages.  DS Jones told Jeremy that Julie had said that he had called her before calling the police which contradicted what both he and Julie had initially told police. The time of the call needed to be ‘fixed’ at a much earlier time for the prosecution to state that he called Julie first. This corresponds to PC West’s log having been recorded much earlier but he altered his testimony saying that he filled the log out wrong by ten minutes.

After days of questioning and with all the  confusion, Jeremy said that maybe he did call Julie first.  This single discrepancy was used against Jeremy although it actually has no real bearing on the facts; whether he called Julie first or the police second the events still happened just as he had said.  Since the interview Jeremy has maintained that he called the police before he called Julie.  There are no other discrepancies in Jeremy’s accounts throughout his 27 years. This single issue was used to state that Jeremy had lied. Jeremy Bamber’s account has stood up to scrutiny over 27 years and is very robust by comparison with the testimony of Mugford, who had lied about their engagement, the end of their relationship, Jeremy’s relationship with Collins, MacDonald being the hit man, her involvement in drugs and crime independently of Jeremy and her pre-trial deal with the News of the World for 25k.

Through all of the witness accounts, many people have altered their accounts and statements contradict each other, there is only one account which remains the same to this day and it is the account of Jeremy Bamber.  This is because it is the truth and the truth does not alter, other witnesses (both police officers and relatives) have exaggerated and embellished their original accounts in the media and to different police enquiries.  Jeremy has coped with the strain of the continual questioning and by comparison with other miscarriages of justice his version of accounts has not altered; he has never confessed nor altered his account under duress.

After his first arrest and release without charge Jeremy was approached by the newspapers for his story.  Naively he went to meet with one after his solicitor advised him against it.  But Jeremy was tired of being vilified by the newspapers after his arrest and wanted to tell his story.  Jeremy said that Brett Collins also advised that he should go to meet with the journalist. But the Sun journalist wasn’t interested in Jeremy’s account, and continually asked questions about Sheila Caffell and requested any modelling pictures which might have been pornographic.  Jeremy had told him that there were none and that there might have been some topless ones but Colin Caffell would have those.  The journalist ran the story reporting that the newspaper had been offered these pictures and they also went to the police. The newspaper never obtained pictures of Sheila, because they didn’t exist, further proof that Jeremy Bamber had not intended to sell any pictures to the newspaper.

Jeremy’s efforts to tell his story had gone disastrously wrong, this coupled with the burglary at the caravan park made the outlook very bleak.  Stories escalated about Jeremy’s relationship with Brett Collins and his trips abroad.  Acquaintances turned their backs on him and his often eccentric, foolish behaviour and socialising with homosexuals was amplified by local gossip.  His enjoyment of cannabis, later down classified to a class C drug and frequently used by the middle classes, was also a major point of 'criminality' used by the prosecution.  He was presented as having spent a lot of money on holidays but the reality was on his trip to Amsterdam he, Brett and Julie had shared the same room to economise.

After his arrest, the trip to the South of France was glamorised but the fact was that Jeremy and Brett stayed in a caravan to keep the costs low.  Anything to escape the now intrusive and destructive glare of the media. Jeremy was an innocent man subjected to similar treatment as other people who are vilified in the press, and subsequently released without charge.

Jeremy had continued smoking pot, taking prescribed sedatives[10] and alcohol to drown out the shock, pain and sorrow.  His arrest and high media profile prompted his new love Virginia to turn her back on him.   Julie had contrived a convoluted story to the police, and his relatives had turned against him and by their own admission, were taking belongings from his family home without permission.[11] Even Colin Caffell had become distant and had written to him saying that the relatives had insisted that Jeremy was duping him and was definitely guilty and Colin didn’t know what to believe now his beautiful twins were dead and Jeremy had been arrested and released without charge.[12]

Now Jeremy was in virtual exile in France with his friend Brett trying to support him in the only way he knew how, by leading him to drinking dens. After a short period under police surveillance the officers abandoned their suspect realising that Jeremy was not going to do anything helpful to the prosecution’s case.[13] Jeremy found the pain was dampened by drinking until the small hours and both he and Brett suffered with food poisoning on their return journey to the UK by ferry. Jeremy was arrested and charged with murder at the port of Dover.

On his arrival in a police van on his last day of freedom, there were several women  waving to him and calling out his name, he smiled back as the cameras snapped him in a dazed, exhausted blur of a mask which veiled the pain he would carry for at least another 27 years. This was a photograph often used over the years by the press to demonstrate that he was a shallow and arrogant young man.
                                                                       ***
'Truth cannot be found through facts alone, truth can only come through understanding'
 Jeremy Bamber, 2012


[1] Collective statements, J Mugford, A. Eaton, P. Eaton, B. Cock, B Collins
[2] Medical records, J Bamber
[3] 25th September, 1985, Police action 769, interview T. Wilson, Solicitor
[4] 3rd July 1991, Statement, T Wilson, Solicitor
[5] 16th September 1985, Statement, A Eaton
[6] Nevill Bamber statement of Estate & Ann Eaton Statement IBID
[7] 17th November, 1985, Statement, J Mugford
[8] Trial Transcript & Statements, J Bouttell
[9] 8th September 1985, Statement, J Mugford
[10] Medical records of Jeremy Bamber
[11] Ann Eaton Statement to COLP
[12] 17th September 1985,Letter to Jeremy from Colin Caffell
[13] Officer’s report Surveillance on JB
 
 

Saturday, 19 January 2013

Jeremy Bamber: My latest letter to MP John Whittingdale


Address provided



16 January 2013



John Whittingdale MP

House of Commons

London

SW1A 0AA



Dear Mr Whittingdale,


Re: Jeremy Bamber


I refer to your letter dated 14 January 2013. Whilst it is a fact that any conviction may only be overturned by the Court of Appeal it does not exclude any MP from bringing the concern before Parliament even to the extent of requesting intervention. You state that 'neither I nor Parliament has any influence over the matter' yet as I wrote in my previous letter to yourself, Andrew Hunter felt able to address Parliament regarding the injustice in Jeremy Bamber's case. You have also previously spoken about Jeremy Bamber in Parliament, in 2001, by asking a question in the House of Commons regarding whether Jeremy’s website should be allowed to exist. Both the above may be viewed as attempting to influence Parliament. Recently Parliamentary influence resulted in the money-guzzling Leveson Inquiry, held, in the main, as a result of media-attention-seeking celebs complaining when the same back-fired.
 

Through his access to files previously intended for PII and inadvertently sent to him, Jeremy Bamber can prove beyond doubt that he is innocent. There are hundreds of examples but a few here; no forensics implicating Jeremy in any part of the crime were found on the cycle he was supposed to have used as a getaway vehicle – photographs of the window from which he was supposed to have exited White House Farm show it was locked from the inside and photographs taken three weeks after the murders show flakes of red paint on the kitchen floor and scratches to the mantle which were not present in the original scene-of-crime photographs taken on the day of the murders. How did that happen? The silencer (sound moderator) was pivotal in convicting Jeremy, with the trial judge telling the jury they could convict him 'on the evidence of the silencer alone' but recently discovered photographs of the marks on Nevill Bamber's body show that they match more precisely the shape and dimensions of the gun muzzle and not the shape and dimensions of the silencer, yet the CCRC continue to deny the significance of these along with many other examples of tampering with evidence and refuse to refer back to the Court of Appeal. One can only question why? 
 

My motivation is not only that I believe Jeremy is innocent, but that this injustice could happen to me or one of mine or even one of yours. I once would have placed my faith in the integrity of our Criminal Justice System but over the years many cases of police corruption and cover-up have been exposed including Eddie Gilfoyle, Hillsborough, and more recently the Chief Whip Andrew Mitchell altercation.

 
Jeremy Bamber's conviction was brought about by a deliberate and successful attempt to pervert the course of justice at his trial and continues via, in my opinion, the collusion of some who have a vested interest in keeping the truth from being exposed.


Jeremy has over thirty lever-arch files in his cell, containing documents destined for PII. He has scrutinised thousands of them and has found hundreds of pieces of evidence showing how Essex Police and others perverted the course of justice. I have copies. Why would he spend twenty seven years trying to prove his innocence if it were not so? It cannot be an easy task. Jeremy has passed a lie detector test which was refused him until 2007 and had over twenty five tests for psychopathy, all negative. He can do no more – it is time for the guilty to be brought to justice and for justice to be seen to be done.


Jeremy's Campaign Team are not weirdos or crackpots or conspiracy junkies; they are intelligent, caring, informed and enlightened people and there are many more like them. Public support for Jeremy grows daily and I take comfort in the fact that when our politicians refuse to address corruption and injustice it is often public opinion which enforces change. Jeremy hangs on to his father's words, 'Don't worry Jeremy, the truth always comes out in the wash'.

I will keep you informed, at least I can say I tried and if-and-when the truth does come out, you can never say, you did not know.

 
Yours sincerely,





cc. Nick Clegg Deputy Prime Minister

 

Monday, 7 January 2013

Jeremy Bamber: PS Bews and PC Myall must own up...

 
To cover up....
 
The following is taken from the media pack on Jeremy Bamber's official website:        (edits in italics: Poppy Ann Miller)

3. Signs of life inside White House Farm:

 
a) PS Bews, PC Myall and Jeremy saw someone in the master bedroom at 04:00am. After the reconnaissance of the house and the sighting of someone in the master bedroom, all three ran back to the radio car, where PS Bews made a situation report to HQ over the radio asking for armed assistance.

At Jeremy's trial PS Bews denied that someone was seen in the master bedroom and has subsequently given press interviews and appeared on television repeating his claims that what he saw was a shadow or a trick of the light.

Essex Police have not disclosed a copy of this situation report, nor disclosed the audio recordings of all the radio messages from this incident which would have seemingly aided the prosecution.

b) Firearms officers tasked with specifically keeping watch on the master bedroom window state that at 07:00 am the curtains were closed. At 07:30 am a different police officer took over and reported that the curtains had been opened and the bedroom light was on. This person who had been seen by three people at 04:00am was likely the same person who closed the bedroom curtains prior to 07:00am, and opened them at some point between 07:00 and 07:30 am.

c) At the scene before police broke down the door two independent officers in different locations saw what they thought was a weapon in an upstairs bedroom window.
This weapon was not present when police broke in, any photographs taken of this room have not been disclosed to the Defence. 

All statements are supported with documentary evidence.

Visit:   http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/
 

Friday, 21 December 2012

Jeremy Bamber: Flyer


Jeremy Bamber
 

IS INNOCENT


IMPRISONED FOR 29 YEARS FOR A CRIME HE COULD NOT HAVE COMMITTED

Find out more about why, visit his official site and know the TRUTH

Friday, 14 December 2012

Jermy Bamber: Appeal rejection

Although I despise the negative terminology used in regard to Jeremy in much of the press, I do believe that public opinion is valuable and whilst Jeremy remains in the media there is hope that people will read the real evidence which shows beyond all doubt that Jeremy could not have committed the murders for which he has been unjustly imprisoned for twenty seven years.

In order to change public opinion, first you have to gain their attention.

 Poppy Ann Miller

 

Tolleshunt D'Arcy: Bamber vows to fight on after latest appeal rejection

Tolleshunt D'Arcy: Bamber vows to fight on after latest appeal rejection Tolleshunt D'Arcy: Bamber vows to fight on after latest appeal rejection 
              
Jeremy Bamber has vowed to fight on after losing a High Court bid to have his case reviewed.
Bamber, 51, was jailed for life in 1986 for the murders of his parents June and Nevill, his adopted sister Sheila Caffell, 27, and her twin sons Nicholas and Daniel at the family farm in Tolleshunt D’Arcy.

Bamber has always protested his innocence claiming it was Sheila, who was a schizophrenic, who killed the family before turning the gun on herself.

Bamber is calling for a third appeal against his conviction.

However, the Criminal Cases Review Commission refused to refer his application.

Bamber’s legal team challenged the decision and applied for permission to seek a judicial review.

However, last Thursday, at the High Court, his application was refused by Sir John Thomas, president of the Queen's Bench Division, and Mr Justice Globe.

SEE THE STANDARD FOR THE FULL STORY
http://www.essexcountystandard.co.uk/search/?page=1&searchpattern=Jeremy+Bamber
 

Friday, 29 June 2012

Mark Duggan: IPCC threatened with 'contempt of court'


The Independent 
Attrib.Paul Peachy 29 June 2012
A coroner threatened the independent police watchdog with contempt of court yesterday for withholding documents from its own investigation into the fatal shooting by police of Mark Duggan.
The fatal shooting of the young black man by a specialist police team in August last year was the spark that led to nights of rioting in major urban centres – but it emerged in March that an inquest into the death may never be held. Andrew Walker, the coroner, said yesterday that he was no closer to deciding whether it could go ahead than in March and in angry exchanges called on the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) to hand over documents within 28 days.
"I am being told, if I understand it correctly, that I am not given copies of the statements and evidence [the IPCC] have gathered until they choose to give it," Mr Walker said. "My statutory obligation is being undermined, is that not a contempt of court?"
He said that he had received the first statements from police officers, but nothing from those investigating the shooting by the specialist police team which had trailed the car carrying Mr Duggan to Tottenham, north London. Robin Tam, QC, representing the IPCC, said: "We take the view that it would be unhelpful and potentially misleading to be drip-feeding disclosure."
If the IPCC refuses the family may force a judicial review of the case. The inquest has been delayed because of a separate court case over the gun that was allegedly passed to Mr Duggan, and was said to have been found close to where he died wrapped inside a sock.
The coroner has also not been able to see documents, understood to relate to evidence from a phone tap in the run-up to the police operation, which by law cannot be shown to an inquest. It has led to calls from senior police officers, the IPCC, MPs and the family for a change in the law. Mr Walker will decide later this year if the inquest can go ahead or a different inquiry takes its place.
The family has been harshly critical of the IPCC investigation and yesterday called for the resignation of the senior investigator and the abolition of the organisation. The dead man's aunt, Carole Duggan, said: "There is a lot of anger from the family because we are almost 11 months down the line and we are still no further on, we know nothing more than we did last August. "They [the IPCC] are incompetent and they should be abolished… we do not trust them, they have to be abolished."

Sunday, 3 June 2012

Police Corruption: Failures in convictions....


News
Written by Criminal Law and Justice Weekly   
Saturday, 02 June 2012 00:00
More than 8,500 allegations of police corruption over three years resulted in the conviction of only 13 police officers, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) has revealed, as it called for greater investigation powers. 
In the three years to 2011, there were 8,542 allegations of police corruption across all forces in England and Wales. Of those, 837 cases were referred to the IPCC. The IPCC then took a direct role in 104 cases, eventually referring 47 to the CPS, as a result of which 18 officers were charged and prosecuted, 13 were found guilty and 10 were imprisoned. 
Nearly two-thirds of the 837 cases related to perverting the course of justice or theft and fraud. As a result of the IPCC investigations, a further 76 officers were found guilty of gross misconduct or misconduct, but only 14 were dismissed.
The IPCC said discussions are under way with Home Office officials to secure 'the additional powers necessary to enable … the most effective corruption-related investigations', among them the ability to gain access to data held by third parties and investigate contracted-out employees.
In her foreword to the IPCC report, Dame Anne Owers, Chair of the IPCC, noted that 'the public is understandably doubtful about the extent to which … the police can investigate themselves' but emphasised that 'corruption is not widespread, or considered to be widespread'......

Oh really......?

Saturday, 31 March 2012

Jeremy Bamber: Robert Boutflour


The late Robert Boutflour was the husband of Pamela, June’s sister.  

After the tragic events at White House Farm on 7 August 1985, Robert, by his own admission, was immediately dissatisfied with the police investigations and the pathologist’s conclusions that Sheila Caffell had killed the family then herself.

Robert had married well and Pamela’s parents, Mabel and Leslie Speakman gave Robert the tenancy of Carbonells Farm and Burnt Ash Farm.  

After Leslie Speakman died he left Pamela, June, Ann and Jeremy a share each of the Osea Road caravan site. [1] Crime had been a growing concern with intruders at the caravan site and Jeremy had expressed concern about this.  At the time Jeremy had wanted to introduce new technologies such as CCTV.  Jeremy was not convinced the manager of the Camp Site, Jim Carr was doing an adequate job and to prove his point further, he burgled the caravan park with the aid of his then girlfriend Julie Mugford.  He had entered the office by pulling the key through the letter box which was always left there.  Jeremy thought this to be a ridiculous security arrangement and had proven the point that security was extremely lax.  Jeremy had hoped this would warrant heightened security and improve management of the site.  He did not realise at the time that this act would be used as evidence against him in a murder trial as he grieved for his family. [2]

Robert Boutflour jumped at the chance to make Jeremy look bad almost immediately but his badgering of DCI Jones did not work, DCI Dickinson’s post trial investigation later noted that “The Original Investigation officer would have taken the inheritance issue into consideration when he was approached by Mr Boutlfour and so placed little value on his claims that it was Jeremy who had killed the family. [3]

Later in one of his statements Robert Boutflour details that after one of the meetings at Osea Road Caravan Park Jeremy had said to him “I could easily kill my parents”, curiously there were no other witnesses to this statement.   If Jeremy had intended to shoot his parents why then did he tell his uncle?  This is hardly the action of a clever calculating murderer as the prosecution claimed.[4]  At trial the Jury asked the question “If Jeremy Bamber was found guilty and imprisoned for many years, who would benefit financially, could it be his uncle and family.   Motive for his uncle to say he could kill his family.” [5]

Jeremy had told police that he was present in the kitchen on the evening before the tragedies when a conversation between Nevill, June and Sheila took place.  He said that they were discussing the possibility of fostering the twins. Robert Boutflour told police that he believed this to be a lie by Jeremy and Robert described the suggestion of fostering of the children as “unthinkable.”  But Robert Boutflour knew nothing of the Bamber and Caffell affairs, there are statements made by several social workers about the children’s well being[6], also from their nursery teachers[7] and one of the foster mothers to the twins was also interviewed by police.[8]  The statements and diaries of Robert Boutflour can be taken apart paragraph by paragraph and found to be contradicted by other statements and documentation.

Was Robert Boutflour a successful man in his own right as his father had been?  Had there been ‘no love lost’ between Nevill and himself simply because Robert wasn’t a good farmer?  Had Robert continued to receive handouts from his mother in law and did he feel resentful of Nevill who paid rent on most of the land he farmed and probably still managed make more profit than Robert?  Many of these questions remain but Nevill made no provision for Robert or Pamela in his will and the only relatives he provided for were Ann Eaton a sum of £250 and Anthony and Jackie Pargeter the sum of £1,000 each.  Both paltry sums of money considering the estate collectively came in at £425,000.  Nevill had left his entire estate in his will to June, Sheila and Jeremy.  June Bamber had also left her entire estate to Jeremy, not naming Pamela, Robert or Ann at all, she had included the sum of £100 to be left to David Boutflour and had awarded her housekeeper Mrs Jean Bouttell £1,000 for her devoted service. To know that Jeremy was the sole benefactor to the estate must have come as no surprise to Robert Boutfour. [9]

Another bone of contention might have been that Robert probably couldn’t afford to pay for private schooling for David and Ann who attended state schools in contrast to Nevill and June who paid for their adopted children Sheila and Jeremy to go public school.  The Bambers had paid for the best education they could find for their children with Jeremy later attending Gresham’s College and Sheila attending finishing school in London.[10]

Local people tell that Robert felt that Jeremy was a “Cuckoo” in the nest and that Robert Boutflour had cruelly nick named him so, this was a family joke to ridicule the adoptee Jeremy.  Robert Boutflour also described Jeremy as engaging in “Unsavoury homosexual activities.” And in his opinion this suggested that he was a criminal living on the peripherals of society because of the friendships he formed with homosexuals like Brett Collins.[11]

The smudge of watery blood appearing on the kitchen window at white house farm which Robert and Ann discovered when searching for clues in the house actually turned out to be blood from when the police cleaned the house.[12] Robert Boutflour also distastefully suggested that an unused tampon found on a table in the dining room could have been used by Jeremy to clean the barrel of a sound moderator. [13]

Robert Bouflour also made up the idea that Jeremy had used June’s ladies bicycle as a ‘getaway’ vehicle from the scene by riding over farm land in the middle of the night; of course there was no forensic evidence to connect Jeremy to the bicycle or traces of blood on it.[14]  So intent was he that the “cuckoo in the nest” would not inherit the Bamber estate that he says himself that he was “desperate to know what to do” and he discussed this with the manager of Osea Road Caravan Park who suggested that his son, Robert, a Metropolitan police officer, had recommended he go to the Chief Constable to discuss his concerns.

[15]  This meeting was curiously the same weekend that Julie Mugford attended Witham police station with her story; in fact there were only 3 days between Robert’s visit to ACC Simpson and Julie’s attendance at Witham Police station. [16] Jeremy Bamber says that Julie’s father was a manager in a chicken factory and they traded with Ann Eaton although there are no supporting documents to this link.  Having said this, Mugford, the Boutflour’s and the Eaton’s knew each other before and during the tragedy which is well documented.  You can draw your own conclusions about what this coincidence might mean.

Boutflour also states that Essex Police officers told him details of the case in confidence which should never been revealed to a member of the public. He notes in his statements that he was angry that the police had not found any evidence to suggest that the tragedy was anything other than a murder suicide. He also details Jeremy as “resisting family assistance” but this is untrue; Jeremy had given Ann Eaton permission to access White House Farm in his absence with a set of keys he provided for her, he had also sent her a bunch of flowers thanking her for support. [17]

Robert Boutflour details that Jeremy had been trying to get Sheila to load the rifle in front of June and Pamela but Pamela made no such recollection of the incident in her statements.  Jeremy denied ever doing this.  It is now known that Sheila’s fingerprints were found on the bullet cases of the cartridges and this was not disclosed. [18]  One can only postulate that the police told Robert Boutlfour about this and in an attempt to explain it he made a statement of how Shiela’s fingerprints came to be on the bullet cases.  He had been adamant that the farmer’s daughter would not have known how to fire the weapon.  Peter Eaton details in his draft statements to The City of London Police that he saw Sheila with a gun on a shoot in Scotland some years previous.  He also stated that he had seen photographs of Sheila holding a gun. [19]  

In fact most of the relatives in the case made up to three draft statements before submitting their final draft; if not illegal then this is a most unethical practice.  Nevertheless there are no draft statements or statements from Julie Mugford from either the Dickinson Review or the City of London Police Enquiry.  Mugford was certainly interviewed for the former but it is unknown whether she was interviewed for the latter.  In any case these documents remain under Public Interest Immunity. [20]  You may well ask why should this information be hidden?

Robert Boutflour details the afternoon where his son David found the Sound Moderator in the gun cupboard, saying in the exhibit evidence of his diary, that he remembered this occasion well because the late Basil Cock, who was the accountant at the time, had visited the house with them on that day, but took no interest in the moderator and was busy complaining about the finger printing dust.[21] This was the enormous mistake which the Defence never picked up on – the house had not been fingerprinted on the 10th of August when David found the sound moderator.  The house was not fingerprinted until after the 8th of September when Jeremy was arrested. 

It is clear that Robert Boutflour did not tell the truth in his statements, or to the court when asked about the inheritance issue. Sady Jeremy’s Defence didn’t challenge the chain of evidence for the moderator other wise so many anomalies would have been exposed.

Robert did not tell the court when they asked the vital question about his motives, that when the tragedy had occurred, he did NOT own all of the Speakman estate; but within a short period after the deaths but before the trial, curiously Mabel Speakman (June’s and Pamela’s mother) disinherited Jeremy and named Pamela as benefactor.  He concealed his motive as a key prosecution witness in giving evidence against Jeremy and ultimately benefitted upon his conviction. [22] Mabel Speakman never gave a witness statement to police as it was considered she was too ill to enter into legal documents, nevertheless she had been well enough to change her will. [23]




[1] 10th September 1985, Statement, R, Boutflour
[2] 10th September 1985, Interview, J. Bamber
[3] Nov 1986, DCI Dickinson Review
[4] 16th December 1985, Statement, R Boutflour
[5] Question from the jury about relatives motive to lie in court
[6] 30th September 1985, Statement, M Abel, Social Worker
[7] 28th August 1985, Statement, E. Watson, Teacher
[8] Action 1203, Interview, Mrs Lester
[9] 3rd August 1979, Last Will & Testament Nevill Bamber
[10] DCI Dickinson Review
[11] 18th June 1991, Officers report, DI Hammett
[12] 2th June 1986, Officers Report, DI Cook
[13] 10th September 1985, Statement, R Boutflour
[14] Statement, J, Hawyward, Holmes ref 33/305
[15] 10th September 1985, Statement, R Boutflour
[16] 9th September 1985, Statement, J Mugford & 10th September 1985, R Boutflour
[17] 16th September 1985, Statement C.A Eaton
[18] 2002, Michael Turner appeal notes official disclosure by CPS
[19] Peter Eaton COLP Draft Statement
[20] DCI Dickinson Review, schedule of interviewees & Swan Confidential CPS file on J Mugford
[21]10th August 1985, Diary of R Boutflour
[22] Jury question about Relatives motives
[23] Police actions, Bamber estate documents

Saturday, 8 October 2011

Justice4Jeremy: Evidence of Collusion

Much of the tainting of Jeremy Bamber’s trial was conducted around a second sound moderator (gun silencer) which was introduced by Jeremy’s relatives over a month after the crime was committed.  Instead of questioning this sudden appearance Essex Police and others chose instead, to collude with it.
Documents intended for Public Interest Immunity (PII) were ‘inadvertently’ sent to Jeremy.  PII is a principle of common law under which English courts can grant an Order allowing one litigant to keep evidence from the sight of the other litigants if they consider disclosure to be damaging to public interest.  So it is clear that the plan was for these documents to be buried, safely out-of-sight, intended never to see the light-of-day

Jeremy’s most recent sixteen page letter to me provides an in-depth account of what he has found within these documents.  Jeremy’s letters are handwritten.  He writes in detail including reference and exhibit numbers revealing proof of what he has always maintained – his innocence.  Details of documents which evidence beyond dispute the existence of two sound moderators and the ‘losing’, editing and re-writing of crucial evidence.  Jeremy has given me permission to reveal his entire letter and the corruption of documents which he has discovered.  I shall not record it all here though will forward relevant information to the City of London Police (COLP), the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) and the Home Secretary.

For those of us who believe that the administrators of justice in our so-called Great Britain, would not comprehend such malpractice and deceit, Jeremy states on more than one occasion, ‘I have the documents to prove it’. 

The following are direct quotes from Jeremy’s letter and for brevity I have paraphrased others.

‘COLP (City of London Police) discovered that Glynis Howard and her assistant Leslie Tucker; John Hayward and his assistant, Andrew Palmer; Brian Elliott and his assistant, Louise Float and Malcolm Fletcher all signed a set of falsified documents for a second sound moderator to create a chain of evidence paper trail capable of deceiving the jury and it did.......I have their lab notes.’
‘They(sound moderators) are both the same, Parker-Hale MM1 type and someone simply took SBJ/1 out of its cardboard tube packaging and slipped in DB/1 that had been contaminated with red paint from the scene.
‘And in any event they admitted this to COLP in 1991 but COLP and Essex Police just covered it up under PII.  John Hayward took photos of SBJ/1 on 12th Sept ’85, well him and his assistant Andrew Palmer, COLP showed these photos to Brian Elliott in 1991 and asked, “Is that the same sound moderator you examined?” 
Elliott replies indicating that he did not accept it could be the same sound moderator and provides an explanation as to why that is the case, including a description of how the sound moderator he examined differed from the one in the photo in relation to the positioning of red paint on it.
‘Everyone examined the sound moderator under a  microscope as well as by eye and it’s clear that the first one SBJ/1 had blood on it and this smear of red paint and the second one DB/1 was switched with SBJ/1 after being sent to the lab on 20/Sept/85.’
‘I can prove every word of the above – I have all the PII primary documents showing exactly how my relatives and Essex Police and the forensic scientists at Huntingdon and COLP and PCA (now the IPCC) all worked together to either directly corrupt the sound moderator evidence or actively assisted in concealing that Essex Police found SBJ/1 and it was switched between 20th and 25th Sept ’85 at Huntingdon Forensic Laboratory with DB/1 that had been used to scratch and score the kitchen mantle shelf at White House Farm to falsely implicate me as a murderer. ....I have the documents showing that it was.......These are the document references: Exhibit signed by Glynis Howard, Malcolm Fletched, John Hayward and Brian Elliott:- ‘Police Crime Number’ SC/786/85, ‘Description of Article ‘Silencer’ DB/1, crossed out, and DRB/1 in brackets:- Serial Number 22, as the identification marker.’
Jeremy has no doubt that lawyers, judiciary as well as the Home Office must have known about this; and what about the media?  Considering the damage much of the press did in promulgating biased views, influencing public opinion through their coverage of Jeremy’s case, I wonder if they will attempt to compensate in some small way by publishing this evidence?  The truth!  Though I appreciate it might be difficult for them to recognise the truth 'even if it jumped up and bit them!'
I feel it reprehensible that those to whom we look for justice would rather lie and deceive than admit they were wrong.  That those who set themselves up in public office as upholders of the 'Law', can collude to send an innocent man to prison and then leave him there for TWENTY SIX YEARS rather than face up to their own shortcomings.
It doesn’t bear thinking about and maybe some people would rather not think about the enormity of the true crime here.  Heartbreaking.
I do not believe there is a Heaven for the just and a Hell for the unjust but for one brief moment there I wished there were!

'Crimes that Shook Britain' Jeremy Bamber. View here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lE9gcRGJrKE