Address
removed
29
October 2011
FYIA
Criminal
Cases Review Commission
5
St Philip's Place
Birmingham
B3
2PW
Letter by email to:complaints@ccrc.x.gsi.gov.uk
Hard copy by Recorded Delivery
Dear
Sir/Madam,
Re: R v Bamber 1986 IPCC Case
number 2011/015691
I
write to you due to my grave concerns regarding recent information I have
received which I have reason to believe will prove that the trial of Jeremy
Bamber and subsequent appeals were tainted.
Documents
intended for Public Interest Immunity (PII) were ‘inadvertently’ sent to Jeremy
Bamber. It is clear that these documents
were intended never to be in the public arena for reasons which will be made
clear upon reading them.
Jeremy’s
most recent sixteen page letter to me provides an in-depth account of what he
has found within these documents.
Jeremy’s letters are handwritten.
He writes in detail including reference and exhibit numbers and he has
the written evidence to support every statement he makes.
I
believe it is crucial that this information is placed in your hands as it shows
beyond doubt that Jeremy’s trial was tainted; that witnesses perjured
themselves also that Essex Police and others including the City of London
Police falsified or withheld evidence which would have supported Jeremy’s continued
pleas of his innocence. Jeremy states on
more than one occasion, ‘I have the
documents to prove it’. The
following in red italics are direct quotes from Jeremy’s letter and of his
findings within these documents
‘COLP
(City of London Police) discovered that Glynis Howard and her assistant Leslie
Tucker; John Hayward and his assistant, Andrew Palmer; Brian Elliott and his
assistant, Louise Float and Malcolm Fletcher all signed a set of falsified
documents for a second sound moderator to create a chain of evidence paper
trail capable of deceiving the jury and it did.......I have their lab notes.’
‘They(sound
moderators) are both the same, Parker-Hale MM1 type and someone simply took
SBJ/1 out of its cardboard tube packaging and slipped in DB/1 that had been
contaminated with red paint from the scene.
‘And in
any event they admitted this to COLP in 1991 but COLP and Essex Police just
covered it up under PII. John Hayward
took photos of SBJ/1 on 12th Sept ’85, well him and his assistant Andrew Palmer,
COLP showed these photos to Brian Elliott in 1991 and asked, “Is that the same
sound moderator you examined?”
Elliott
replied as follows;
‘Well,
the one I examined had red paint flakes impacted into the pattern on the
knurled end. Also, the one I examined
had a large piece of adhesive tape with flakes of red paint stuck to it, that
was stuck along the sound moderator as you can see in the drawing my assistant
made on 25/Sept/’85.’
Jeremy
adds, ‘and you can see it’.
‘Everyone
examined the sound moderator under a microscope as well as by eye and it’s
clear that the first one SBJ/1 had blood on it and this smear of red paint and
the second one DB/1 was switched with SBJ/1 after being sent to the lab on
20/Sept/85.’
‘I can
prove every word of the above – I have all the PII primary documents showing
exactly how my relatives and Essex Police and the forensic scientists at
Huntingdon and COLP and PCA (now the IPCC) all worked together to either
directly corrupt the sound moderator evidence or actively assisted in
concealing that Essex Police found SBJ/1 and it was switched between 20th and
25th Sept ’85 at Huntingdon Forensic Laboratory with DB/1 that had been used to
scratch and score the kitchen mantle shelf at White House Farm to falsely
implicate me as a murderer. ....I have the documents showing that it
was.......These are the document references: Exhibit signed by Glynis Howard,
Malcolm Fletched, John Hayward and Brian Elliott:- ‘Police Crime Number’
SC/786/85, ‘Description of Article ‘Silencer’ DB/1, crossed out, and DRB/1 in
brackets:- Serial Number 22, as the identification marker.’
I
would plead for justice here. Jeremy has
been imprisoned for twenty six years for a crime which can only have been
carried out by someone of a deranged mind and for which he has always
maintained his innocence even to the extent of taking a polygraph test along
with twenty seven psychiatric tests, all of which found no evidence of mental
ill health or psychopathy.
After
reading this evidence, to incarcerate him for a day longer would constitute an
act of the most heinous kind adding further to the injustice of what must be
the longest known miscarriage of justice on British soil.
It
is not an unreasonable request that this matter be treated with the utmost
urgency and I await your response.
Yours
faithfully,
Cc
COLP, IPCC, Theresa May Home Secretary, Kenneth Clarke Justice Minister, John
Whittingdale MP.
